But see, if you’ve read my actual posts concerning the two, I share your sentiment. I think they’re somewhat close as well. But I believe Subban is clearly ahead. To you it’s a nose, to me, it’s a full head.
Again, I’m not basing my opinion on that one poster. I take most habs fans opinions less than more neutral fans. Simply because, many of them could have more bias behind their decisions, especially because of the anti and pro Bergevin position.
And I wasn’t talking to you specifically when I said bring something to the table. It wasn’t about you. It was a general thought to anyone trying to argue that Weber is more effective than Subban. I have no problem with difference of opinion. I welcome it. But I’m going to ask anyone to back it up.
The issue is, you came into a discussion that I was having with that ONE GUY, arguing about how there’s a debate. I’m pretty sure you weren’t validating his opinion. But your timing was not good. It came off as you giving validation to that type of reasoning, which IMO, is utter nonsense. “Better in every conceivable way, PK fanboys, millennial, etc”
If you’ve read the thread, you’d see I’m more than welcoming to discuss differences of opinions. Ive has several discussions with 417 on several different topics we disagree on. Yet it’s still a cordial discussion with actual content.
It seems more people are interesting in delivering a hot one-liner, and escaping, rather than actually believing and defending what they’re saying. (Again, this is a general thought)