Bank Shot
Registered User
- Jan 18, 2006
- 11,343
- 6,860
those whites are very very nice
Most of it looks nice but..
I think the numbers look like crap.
The new blue and orange has poor contrast when side by side.
those whites are very very nice
Most of it looks nice but..
I think the numbers look like crap.
The new blue and orange has poor contrast when side by side.
Agree not a fan of the numbers. I also like the other orange. But otherwise they are nice.
I'm not impressed with the cresting on these Adidas jerseys. It's a screen print on a single layer that's then sewn on. 'Lightweight', sure, but cheap as **** looking IMO. Those jerseys should be $180, not $250. Otherwise the jerseys look nice.
Thoughts after seeing them in person?
I wasn't sold on the new whites until I saw them in action. Imo they're a fantastic, tasteful modernization of the old whites.
The numbers are perforated. Apparently they weigh 60% less than the numbers from the previous jerseys.They are growing on me as well although I noticed that when there is a close up of the numbers it looks like it isn't a solid navy blue color.
It almost looks as if there is a pattern on the numbers as well.
I think it's hilarious when they state the numbers way less. Like really? the jersey weighs 0.004 pounds less because of the perforated numbers? Like that will make a difference ???
The numbers are perforated. Apparently they weigh 60% less than the numbers from the previous jerseys.
Columbus, Dallas, Florida, Ottawa, and Vegas are also using these.
Good stuff Del. Who would have thought that number weight was actually an issue?
Might have actually been a way to save a little money (on materials) in manufacturing the jersey and it was just marketed in a way that made it sound like being lighter actually mattered.
I thought it was for letting the jersey breath and being more comfortable for the players.
I'm sure we will see a blue third jersey next year. I'm going to hold off to see what those look like. Either the new orange or the third.