The only way this works out for the Hawks is if the big bodied Swede is able to play in the NHL. Otherwise, they traded the wrong forward (should have been Anisimov).
I'm pretty sure he's going to be traded too.
The only way this works out for the Hawks is if the big bodied Swede is able to play in the NHL. Otherwise, they traded the wrong forward (should have been Anisimov).
"could" "probably"Again, your basis is on a bunch of ifs. I prefer to look at the hear and now. Right here, right now, this is a gross trade. Nothing against the player, but NASH way over paid here. They could have found somebody else for far less and who probably could have done the same job.
Hartman is worth the late first for the preds. The only thing i would be worried about is how terrible he was in the playoffs last year. Could be rookie playoff jitters tho.
Yes, but we're going all in the next few years, a 1st that we'll have to wait around 2-5 years to develop doesn't help us in the playoffs.
Tolvanen was pretty much a free top 5 pick, having him makes giving up this 1st a lot easier. Not every 1st is going to work out that well.
I don't like how everyone seems to already assume that the 1st going to Chicago is gonna be a late 1st rounder. It could just as easily be in the 16-20 range, in which case this would really hurt, RFA or not.
The player that they would've taken with that 1st round pick could've been in Nashville's system for at least 7 years. Naturally, he could've busted, but he very well could've ended up better than Hartman. Imagine if this trade had occurred a year ago for last year's 1st-round pick. Perhaps it wouldn't have seemed like a steep price at the time, but you would've been giving up Tolvanen for Hartman.
Jeez people really over value a late first. Hartman is a solid player and this makes sense for both sides. Hartman was inconsistent and the hawks have a lot of other players his age that are forwards and that are better. The Hawks really need blue chip prospects rn and thats why they made the trade.
I was listening to someone on a sports radio program last week. They were discussing how NHL GMs are placing higher value on their first round picks these days because, with the cap and with good players so rarely coming available in free agency (and when they do they sign outrageous contracts often enough), that first round pick could be the difference between being able to compete for several years and not.
What was Chicagos motivation to trade Hartman? Seems like he should have been part of their future.
Unfortunately, the Hawks aren’t finding that blue chipper in the late first round. Btw, Hartman was a mid-late first rounder. If the Hawks find another player similar to Hartman with this pick, able to contribute in three years, then it’s a push on the players but a loss overall in the next three years because they won’t have him on the roster contributing right now.Jeez people really over value a late first. Hartman is a solid player and this makes sense for both sides. Hartman was inconsistent and the hawks have a lot of other players his age that are forwards and that are better. The Hawks really need blue chip prospects rn and thats why they made the trade.