Remember when everyone was dumping on the Reds for giving Votto that contract? Fun times.
Yeah, but he keeps on playing like a HOFer, brilliant, brilliant player. Love to watch him at the plate, a perfect example for any upcoming kid.He's still owed 150 mill.
Yeah, but he keeps on playing like a HOFer, brilliant, brilliant player. Love to watch him at the plate, a perfect example for any upcoming kid.
Agree but the point I'm making is that they'll be paying him 25 mill per until age 40. This could still turn ugly.
I do think Votto has 2 more elite years in him.
Agree but the point I'm making is that they'll be paying him 25 mill per until age 40. This could still turn ugly.
I do think Votto has 2 more elite years in him.
It's still a bad contract.Remember when everyone was dumping on the Reds for giving Votto that contract? Fun times.
It's still a bad contract.
And the Reds aren't going anywhere - wasting Votto's prime years and hurting their draft position by keeping him around.
The contract is untradable.
It's still a bad contract.
And the Reds aren't going anywhere - wasting Votto's prime years and hurting their draft position by keeping him around.
The contract is untradable.
It's still a bad contract.
And the Reds aren't going anywhere - wasting Votto's prime years and hurting their draft position by keeping him around.
The contract is untradable.
Giambi fell apart mid 30sIt's not a bad contract until Votto starts performing poorly. He's definitely playing to the contract value now, and historically, players with excellent plate discipline and strong contact have hit well into their late 30s. When you think of hitters that decline at that age, he's the opposite. He doesn't strikeout, he doesn't pop out, he rarely swings out of the zone. He never had wicked bat speed that can't be sustained, so his athleticism should keep his swing intact for years to come. He won't continue to put up MVP caliber seasons until he's 40, but he can easily be an all star caliber hitter till then.
If the Reds eat salary, someone would take that contract in a heart beat. Especially budgetary bottomless pits like Boston, New York, or the Dodgers.
It's still a bad contract.
And the Reds aren't going anywhere - wasting Votto's prime years and hurting their draft position by keeping him around.
The contract is untradable.
Giambi fell apart mid 30s
Giambi is nothing like Votto lol. They share a high walk rate, other wise they are very different hitters. Giambi also took steroids, which probably contributed to his rapid decline.
Yeah, that's not a great argument to say the least. It's a monster contract. No one will deny that but Votto is exactly the type of player that should age well vs. someone like Giambi, Tex, Miggy, etc. Hell, even Tex put up an excellent year at age 35.
Exactly. Cincinnati probably shouldn't have offered him that, mostly because they had little to no chance to compete during the years Votto would likely be most productive, but if they didn't offer him 10 years at 25 mil/season, he was going to walk as a free agent. He had no reason to resign with the Reds (beyond loyalty, which rarely if ever keeps superstars with a declining team) without a great contract.
If we look historically at players who have strong contact and excellent plate discipline, they usually age quite well. While we shouldn't expect Votto to be an all-star up until age 40, I wouldn't be surprised if he can consistently put up slash lines of at least .275/.400/.400 until the end of the contract.
you give the individual award to the guy on the best team, got it.
Ah it's so close. Guess I'll go with the guy who has the best teammates
"too close to call! too bad the reds couldn't find pitching with both hands and a map!"
you know how everyone has those daydreams? telling your boss to shove his stupid reports up his ass? or writing that script that goes worldwide and gives you a stupid amount of money?
from the time i was a kid it was to build a time machine. when i was a kid i wanted to use it like biff tannen to get rich on sports betting. other people share this dream and joke about committing murder as a thin guise of altruism. "hurhur i'd kill hitler" and such.
i want to use my time machine for one sole purpose: when the bbwaa is sitting down to create the actual mvp award, an award given by people who watch baseball and not by a car manufacturer or a flawed system of voting that allowed babe ruth to only win one mvp, but an actual, factual mvp award. i want history to be rewritten that as they sat around after finishing writing the criteria of the mvp award and likely making off-color jokes, drinking scotch and sweating through five layers of wool clothing, that they saw something beyond anyone's belief. a swatch of light grew larger all the time in the room until it enveloped the room in blinding light and a man steps out of the light. one of the writers faints as i step out of the light and without an introduction or so much as a "how do you do?" i open up a sharpie and scrawl
"player does not need to play for a winning team to win this award"
at the bottom of the paper in my very poor penmanship. without another word i step back towards the light and come back to present time where we don't have to have the semantics argument every year about what "value" is and how it relates to whether an individual should win an individual award.
i'm sure joey votto would like nothing more than to make the postseason, play in or even win the world series. he certainly did his part this year, posting ridiculous numbers that, had he had any semblance of a major league baseball team around him might have mattered. he lead the planet in obp and basically tiedfrankenstein's monsteraaron judge in most offensive categories. votto is arguably the best hitter in baseball but he shouldn't win the mvp because his team was eliminated in june.
it just doesn't make any sense.