Agreed, not sure how anyone can argue with our current approach or profess to know that certain players would be offended when they're 'demoted'. Unless you're consistently in the locker room or are wasting a clairvoyant talent, you have no idea. Might as well be making generalizations about the Swedish people.
Well I would preface my posts with "from an outsiders perspective" but I think that much goes without saying. Right?
I'm looking at the squeeze and the juice. That's all.
I like a bunch of alternates. What I question is two that are elevated among the rest. That's an A that's better than the others. I call that a C. Just pick a C. Between OEL and Hjalmarsson I think that's obvious. If Hjalmarsson is clearly that much better than the other As than it's very easy. OEL is your C and Hjalmarsson is your A. Rotate the other A. That's fine. This just seems like bullshit p***y footing. If OEL and Hammer are clearly a cut above than that's one C and one A. Right?
I understand it doesn't matter that much. I do. I'm not doomsdaying this. I'm not boycotting over it. I just don't see the upside. Feel free to educate me. I'm happy to be shown the light and change my opinion. I do it all the time. It's a minor thing but it feels haphazard.
We've established that OEL and his partner are one step above the others. Is anyone here honestly thinking that we can't choose between these two?
Maybe it's so simple as Hammer has the rings. He does. He's a little older and has less term on his draft. Maybe OEL isn't the perfect fit. I believe that's also probably true. I can see why you wouldn't pin the C on either. I don't have a problem with no C. What I'm struggling with is the idea of two (or even one permanent A) and a bunch of also As that are less permanent. It's already been figured out in that scenario. There's no C. Easy answer and one I'm fine with. Just rotate all the As, then.