In the end the difference between a team like the Nats and a team like the Yankees or even the Cubs is the ability to punch someone when they are down, that killer instinct. That determination that you will stiff arm any bitch on the way to a championship. And this team does NOT have that. The teams in this city don't have that, but that's an issue for another day. I'm only going to talk about the Nats.
The Nats are a good team. Let's get that out of the way. The Nats have a good roster too. But the inability to knock someone out when they are on the floor is what cost this team. It cost them against St. Louis, it cost them against the Dodgers, and it cost them last night.
You are up 4-1. That place is shaking. I saw it myself. Taylor homers and that place erupts and the Cubs are on the ropes. It's 4-1.
How do you let the Cubs score 9 on you?
It was 4-1. It was 5-0 against St. Louis. And the Nats led 2-1 in the series against the Dodgers.
One commonality in all of these series is the lack of killer instinct. Look at what the Yankees did in their Game 5. Not only did they come back from 0-2 down, but they pounced on Kluber early, took a 3-0 lead. Indians made it 3-2, but no Yankee fretted or stressed out or gave up 4 runs in an inning. Gardner worked the count and got a big base hit for insurance. Every Nationals "clinching" game you've seen in recent memory involved an implosion that cost them the game, usually in the middle innings. Even last year that was the case when the Nats were even up 1-0 on the Dodgers early, and that 3rd base coach calls Werth in and he is out at the plate.
If the Nats were able to take a 4-1 lead and keep it.. if they didn't give up 2 runs immediately afterwards, maybe it's a different story. Even at 4-3 you should be able to maintain that lead. If you can't keep a 4-1 lead or a 5-0 lead in a series you deserve every bit of criticism leveled at you. These are not difficult leads to hold at all.