Voight
#winning
The players were the ones who agreed to this CBA. Clark obviously didn't tell them the new tax penalties were going to have every team to cut down on salary.
Things are heating up...but not with FA signings
Because fans want their teams to win and paying players a bajillion dollars doesn't help towards that. There are internal caps in place as well as a luxury tax that teams can't/don't want to go over so the more you spend on an overpaird Eric Hosmer it means the less the team has to on other players to improve the team. And it's hard to feel sympathy for players turning down 9 figure guaranteed salaries that were already probably going to be bad contracts because they want more.
Well none of this answers my question about why Hosmer's market collapsing seems to please fans. Is it because we're made he asked for too much initially? I just went through a salary negotiation, I asked for a number I never expected to get and met in the middle, why should I be pissed if Hosmer did it? Like, did he ask for 8/200 and expect to sign for something like 7/150 or 6/135 and then those offers never even materialized? I don't really know why I should cheer against him getting that.
How many teams would we classify as actually tanking? Miami for sure. You can possibly make the case for others, but it's not like there are a bunch of teams slashing salary like crazy. It's not like we have a handful of real contenders and every other team is trying to win the top draft pick.
Really, that's their biggest problem? Are they really that worried about public opinion? There are real issues that they should focus on, but this isn't it. Fans are obviously aware of how rich the owners are, we always refer to it as the billionaires arguing with the millionaires.
I don’t even know who John Middleton is lol
Most small market teams like the Pirates and Indians probably net 10-30 million per year. Then you have big market teams like the Mets who net $40M+ and the Yankees who push $100MI do think it would be a bit eye opening to see what the profits are for the owners though. Like we can all guess 50 million or 100 million or whatever but to actually see a hard number it would change perceptions somewhat. I'm still of the mindset that both groups are greedy and to blame though.
I do think it would be a bit eye opening to see what the profits are for the owners though. Like we can all guess 50 million or 100 million or whatever but to actually see a hard number it would change perceptions somewhat. I'm still of the mindset that both groups are greedy and to blame though.
Most small market teams like the Pirates and Indians probably net 10-30 million per year. Then you have big market teams like the Mets who net $40M+ and the Yankees who push $100M
People forget that revenue splits are revenue splits, teams don't net anything until they pay their stadium costs, travel expenses, staff salary, minor league system costs, etc etc
It's just a business like any other. I guess my thing is if that is their biggest problem, then they have no understanding of the actual problems. Public opinion means nothing. The fans are still going to spend boatloads of money regardless of public opinion, unless there is a crazy work stoppage, regardless of who starts it.
Work on fixing arbitration. Work on getting players to UFA faster. Working on making it easier for the top prospects to get to the MLB when they are ready, so the clubs aren't playing a game in delaying their arrival. Those are the real issues that the MLBPA needs to focus on.
To me, this just shows that they don't' get it and can't help themselves. The market has changed, now figure out a better way to work in the new market.