Halla
Registered User
- Jan 28, 2016
- 14,727
- 3,779
There's a difference being on pace, and results.
Repeating it again and again isn't going to make it true.
Marner 61pts draft +2. 69pts draft +3
Boeser 5pts draft +2. 55pts draft +3
Results
There's a difference being on pace, and results.
Repeating it again and again isn't going to make it true.
Marner 61pts draft +2. 69pts draft +3
Boeser 5pts draft +2. 55pts draft +3
Results
Way to nitpick. Way to conveniently ignore missed games.
how does this make sense? HF polls are almost completely useless and have been wrong so many times. If anything, you're drinking hf koolaid for thinking this poll has real value
but wait...u just said pace is irrelevant and only results matter.
Marner just matched Boesers ppg...in 1:10 less per game (including 37 seconds less on the PP)
cheers
its ok to be upsetIt's not so much fun as it is ridiculous. The fact that anyone takes HF polls seriously is pretty sad and funny at the same time.
Having the better player and the better team I guess???? Upset about what???
Marner now at a 0.90ppg for his career, 0.84 for Brock
I still take Marner here but its a lot closer than the hilarious Marner vs Fiala poll
http://hfboards.mandatory.com/threads/marner-vs-fiala.2445657/page-7There was a Marner vs Fiala poll?
Oh lord. And people claim there's no bias against the Leafs on here...
boeser vs marner is essentially a draw right now
If you think there is absolutely no way anyone can consider Boeser equal to or better than Marner than it's obvious you can't see past your own biases. I think you can make an argument for Boeser to be better. Whether or not most people agree with that argument is the point of the debate, no?How is it a draw lol? Marner is better right now. Boeser might be as good but we don't know till he actually plays next year and has stats something similar to this year.
61 points last season, ~70+ points this season (very likely). Higher career PPG, cracked the league at a younger age and did really well and then improved on that season.
Let's see Boeser next year before we put him next to Marner let alone better.
No. Marner has too much of a bigger sample size.boeser vs marner is essentially a draw right now
You don't think the massive difference in sample size matters? It does.If you think there is absolutely no way anyone can consider Boeser equal to or better than Marner than it's obvious you can't see past your own biases. I think you can make an argument for Boeser to be better. Whether or not most people agree with that argument is the point of the debate, no?