Mid 1st round pick: 2004 or 2005?

Discussion in 'NHL Draft - Prospects' started by nyrcup94, Oct 4, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. nyrcup94

    nyrcup94 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    Messages:
    228
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Winston-Salem, NC
    Home Page:
    I was wondering about the depth of the 2004 draft versus 2005. Would you rather have a 1st round pick in the 12-16 range in 2004 or in 2005? It seems that most label the 2004 draft as weak in comparison to the 2005 draft. Any and all opinions are appreciated.
     
  2. X-SHARKIE

    X-SHARKIE Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Messages:
    9,362
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Janesville Wisconsin
    Home Page:
    I would take a 2005 draft pick in that area without much question at all. I think the 2005 draft class well be one of the best in quite some time. I think the North American class might actually be better than 2003's...and on top of that, the European class also appears very strong.

    Although 2004 isn't really all that bad of a draft and I think it gets more bad rep then it deserves...It was an average draft and picks from the 12-16 range should become quite good players.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"