Michalek or Koltsov

Discussion in 'NHL Draft - Prospects' started by mattodette28, Oct 4, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. mattodette28

    mattodette28 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2002
    Messages:
    207
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    leaning between these two for my keeper league prospects draft.
    Who do you think has the highest potential? highest points this year?

    Also, some other guys I could pick and have been thinking about: Perezhogin, kastitsyn, shishkanov, upshall, higgins...almost anyone from the 2003 draft except for the top end guys

    So who would you pick?
     
  2. mattodette28

    mattodette28 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2002
    Messages:
    207
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    konstantin koltsov btw
     
  3. Koltsov71

    Koltsov71 Guest

    I'd go with Milan Michalek.
     
  4. tom_servo

    tom_servo Registered User

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2002
    Messages:
    13,897
    Likes Received:
    319
    Trophy Points:
    199
    Location:
    Pittsburgh
    Home Page:
    Although Koltsov figures to see time with Lemieux, go with Michalek, especially in a keeper league.
     
  5. Don'tcry4mejanhrdina

    Don'tcry4mejanhrdina Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2003
    Messages:
    10,275
    Likes Received:
    305
    Trophy Points:
    154
    Location:
    This space.
    Michalek. Koltsov is starting to be a little too hyped by some people around here.
     
  6. Evilo

    Evilo Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2002
    Messages:
    39,340
    Likes Received:
    322
    Trophy Points:
    199
    Location:
    France
    As all the Pens fans here I'd go with Michalek also.
    However, you need to think it this way IMO.
    Koltsov is a high risk high reward gamble.
    He could develop into a Bure type of player, but he could also develop into an average fourth liner with speed.
    Michalek on the other hand is a sure bet.
    He should be no less than a second liner.

    I also took Koltsov in my keeper league.
    BTW, I also have Nash, Kovalchuk, Sejna, Spezza, Huselius, Leneveu, Pitkanen, etc... so I'm in a good shape for the future which means I could take the Koltsov gamble. If you don't want to gamble, choose Michalek.
     
  7. Alex Kovalev

    Alex Kovalev Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2002
    Messages:
    4,185
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Burlington, Ontario
    Home Page:
    Michalek is worth more right now so I would take him. Though, I like the way Koltsov is progressing.
     
  8. #37-#93-#27*

    #37-#93-#27* Guest

    Michalek
     
  9. Sammy*

    Sammy* Guest

    Koltsov has shown zero ability as a goal scorer . There is absoloutly nothing in his background to suggest he will be a scorer in the NHL.
    To suggest that there is a chance he could develop into another Bure is laughable. Thats like saying George Laraque may turn into Cam Neely.
    Michalek.
     
  10. Jacob

    Jacob Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    41,614
    Likes Received:
    2,189
    Trophy Points:
    235
    Home Page:
    He was one of the top scorers at the WJCs.
     
  11. canucksfan

    canucksfan Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2002
    Messages:
    33,668
    Likes Received:
    266
    Trophy Points:
    199
    Location:
    British Columbia
    Home Page:
    Michalek
     
  12. Sammy*

    Sammy* Guest

    So what. Thats a 2 week tourney. He has not shown any ability in any league over the course of a season.
     
  13. Jacob

    Jacob Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    41,614
    Likes Received:
    2,189
    Trophy Points:
    235
    Home Page:
    He also outscored Pavel Datsyuk, then teammate, in 00-01 (ppg-wise).
     
  14. Sammy*

    Sammy* Guest

    No he didnt.
     
  15. Jacob

    Jacob Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    41,614
    Likes Received:
    2,189
    Trophy Points:
    235
    Home Page:
    Ouch, you're right, by .01%. Point still stands, as Datsyuk is 3 years older.
     
  16. Don'tcry4mejanhrdina

    Don'tcry4mejanhrdina Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2003
    Messages:
    10,275
    Likes Received:
    305
    Trophy Points:
    154
    Location:
    This space.
    Who cares if he has vnot shown the ability in the past? Everyone is picking Mickalek anyway.
     
  17. Jacob

    Jacob Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    41,614
    Likes Received:
    2,189
    Trophy Points:
    235
    Home Page:
    Because he/she said Koltsov had shown "zero" ability, which I disagreed with.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"