McKeen's vs. Hockey News

Status
Not open for further replies.

Snoopy

Registered User
Mar 5, 2005
29
0
mags

I like both the Forecaster and McKeen's. The Forecaster is easily the prettiest of all the mags.

The Hockey News is very disappointing given all the resources they have.

Will Hockey's Future ever do a magazine again? :dunno:
 

Snoopy

Registered User
Mar 5, 2005
29
0
Peca Fan

Thanks for the stats, but all I care about is which magazine would give me the best chance of winning?

If Forecaster, McKeen's or The Hockey News are over or under on a player is no big deal. I just want who has the right order as that will win me the pool.

To a real poolie it is worth getting at least two of them and then form your own opinion using the various stats your pool/league uses.
 

Lionheart

Registered User
Jul 20, 2005
807
0
Ottawa
H N I C said:
I read all three.

Ditto. I also used to buy that Hockey Pool Guide Book (the one that Cherry and all of the Canadian hockey personalities like Hughson, Neale et al wrote for), but it seems to have been halted. They used to have decent writeups on certain prospects as well, though obviously not with the depth of THN or McKeen's
 

PecaFan

Registered User
Nov 16, 2002
9,243
520
Ottawa (Go 'Nucks)
A lot of folks are liking McKeens for the prospect coverage (understandable where we are), but I was only talking about pool predictions above. I wasn't evaluating that aspect of any of the magazines.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad