So, a 60 point two-way player is now a "third line pest"?
What's this board's take on the team's special teams?
Had we drafted Laine, we'd have that one-timer option from the dot for the PP. I love Matthews and with his hand-eye, he might even develop that shooting option for the PP. But as it stands, Marner, Nylander, Matthews, and Kadri all like to have plays develop through them...ie with the puck on their sticks. Aside from maybe Kapanen and Matthews, we don't have a forward with that lethal slap shot who can just wait and strike at the right time. Stamkos would have complemented our prospects nicely.
I was one of Marners biggest fans before we drafted him, but I think Nylander will be better.
can Nylander spell intensity? Mitch can
can Nylander show up in the playoffs? Mitch can
can Nylander spell intensity? Mitch can
can Nylander show up in the playoffs? Mitch can
To be totally honest I actually think Marner's vision/IQ is on another level compared to Nylander's.
Willie would have easily won the scoring title playing on any team in the OHL this past season! I would have bet on it.
I thought Matthews showed a good shot at the events I've at least seen. It might not be the same slap shot at Laine, but if you stick him somewhere and tell him to shoot....I think he'd do pretty well.What's this board's take on the team's special teams?
Had we drafted Laine, we'd have that one-timer option from the dot for the PP. I love Matthews and with his hand-eye, he might even develop that shooting option for the PP. But as it stands, Marner, Nylander, Matthews, and Kadri all like to have plays develop through them...ie with the puck on their sticks. Aside from maybe Kapanen and Matthews, we don't have a forward with that lethal slap shot who can just wait and strike at the right time. Stamkos would have complemented our prospects nicely.
Mathews will be more sheltered his first year unless Bozak gets traded he will play 3rd line. Nylander will get top 6 minutes, because we need him there. A hole was created when Kessel left and Nylander can help on the wing. I don't see the Leafs rushing Mathews who is 18 and yes, I see Nylander with Kadri. Mathews isn't Lemieux.
Yeah, they both will rack up assists but they are creative in different ways. Willy is more explosive and has a better shot, but also tends to hold on to the puck longer and wait for the perfect pass. Marner works better in the cycle, where he tends to spot a pass no one else really sees, he also has an awareness of where everyone is, and how dragging one person out of position can create an amazing chance.To be totally honest I actually think Marner's vision/IQ is on another level compared to Nylander's.
Don't think so, it will probably be whichever forwards get significant minutes on the PK, which I don't think Matthews will get to start (granted neither Bozak or Kadri were used much on the penalty kill). I have a feeling Babcock, after working with Kadri on rounding out his game all of last year may give him a bump in PK minutes this year. Grabner was getting 3 minutes a game last year, so someone will have to fill that void, and I doubt its one of the rookies right off the bat.10 games into the season Matthews will be leading all forwards with ATOI ....
60 point
Please tell me your not talking about Kadri
He's an average 2nd line center or an elite 2 way 3rd line center
With Mathews as a 2way guy and Naz as a 2way guy we can play an offensive minded 2nd line center so Nylander or Brooks (unlikely as he is )would be perfect
Roll three lines not a bad thing
IDK, the World Cup tourney against the best players the world can throw at him, should prepare Matthews pretty good.
This comment seems to come up a lot and it concerns me, the world cup may prepare him for fast paced international hockey, but it wont prepare him for 3rd/4th line plugs with mature strength finishing their checks.
Only a small point but one i feel is missed, and one of the reasons id consider putting Martin with Nylander and Matthews for a few months. I know its an old school mentality but screw it, id want guys to know if they take a run they will have to answer for it
You can cheap shot anyone to be honest. Size hardly matters. Just look at Lindros, one of the biggest guys to step on the ice in height and build.Matthews is taller than quite a bit of nhl players. How can you take a run at a 6'3 guy.
You can cheap shot anyone to be honest. Size hardly matters. Just look at Lindros, one of the biggest guys to step on the ice in height and build.