cneely
Registered User
- Jan 6, 2005
- 10,151
- 1,198
You'll be seeing plenty of them first hand
I think we'll be passing the Lightning, so maybe in round 2.
You'll be seeing plenty of them first hand
I wouldn't be surprised if next season Josh Bailey turns into what David Clarkson did. Remember he had the career year prior to becoming a UFA and look what happened to him after he signed that horrible contract in Toronto, so was it a shock to anyone Bailey did the same thing prior to almost becoming a UFA?So you had Barzal having this kind of rookie year? Same with Josh Bailey? William Karlsson over there on the Knights...the fact is scoring is up this year compared to previous years. No guarantee that continues or doesn't regress. look how many guys are close to or over PPG this year compared to last.
So you had Barzal having this kind of rookie year? Same with Josh Bailey? William Karlsson over there on the Knights...the fact is scoring is up this year compared to previous years. No guarantee that continues or doesn't regress. look how many guys are close to or over PPG this year compared to last.
Individual stats aren't a great argument in this case. Barzal's team is in a less than ideal spot right now. I'll take Leaf team success with their sophomores who aren't as great as Barzal.
So you had Barzal having this kind of rookie year? Same with Josh Bailey? William Karlsson over there on the Knights...the fact is scoring is up this year compared to previous years. No guarantee that continues or doesn't regress. look how many guys are close to or over PPG this year compared to last.
So if the Leafs had drafted Barzal instead of Marner which you said they should have done and let's say Barzal was having the same season in Toronto we are seeing now, you wouldn't be trying to put him down like you do all Maple Leafs players because of your bias hate towards them. So when you say the Leafs should have selected Barzal it's easy to say after the fact when that never happened.How would this question pertain to who is the better coupling? I already explained my choice. Accept it or move on.
I disagree with the Halak/Andersen swap bit, the Islanders are either incapable of playing defensively sound hockey or are just straight up playing pond hockey. I've seen it enough times to know it, if the Isles play a tighter defensive system it's quite possible their player's point totals go down. I'll be really interested to see them next year.Switch Andersen for Halak and I think the gap in team success wouldn't be very large.
Anyway, this whole "took his team to the playoffs" thing is over blown. Are Geaudreau and McDavid bad players now? It takes more than a couple of good players to make a team.
You aren’t even replying to my posts. 1 Barzal is a rookie so there’s no body of work to compare like karlsson and bailey. 2 no I didn’t say it’s guaranteed to continue. I said you’re opinion of he WILL (as an absolute) regress is stupid
This bias hate card you continually play here with posters is really getting tiresome. If you cannot accept posters opinions here on the Main board, this may not be the place for you to post. I gave you my reasons why I think Barzal and Laine will be a better duo. Based on voters, they agree overwhelmingly with me. Time for you to accept others opinions on an Opinion board or move on.So if the Leafs had drafted Barzal instead of Marner which you said they should have done and let's say Barzal was having the same season in Toronto we are seeing now, you wouldn't be trying to put him down like you do all Maple Leafs players because of your bias hate towards them. So when you say the Leafs should have selected Barzal it's easy to say after the fact when that never happened.
The more you keep dancing around the question without answering it is proof enough about what you really think.This bias hate card you continually play here with posters is really getting tiresome. If you cannot accept posters opinions here on the Main board, this may not be the place for you to post. I gave you my reasons why I think Barzal and Laine will be a better duo. Based on voters, they agree overwhelmingly with me. Time for you to accept others opinions on an Opinion board or move on.
I disagree with the Halak/Andersen swap bit, the Islanders are either incapable of playing defensively sound hockey or are just straight up playing pond hockey. I've seen it enough times to know it, if the Isles play a tighter defensive system it's quite possible their player's point totals go down. I'll be really interested to see them next year.
The kid is near PPG as a rookie.....8 guys were PPG last season, it's a pretty clear bet he'll regress.
I don't know if he thinks he's being subtle or what? We all have biases but it's damned smug when you pretend you don't have one.The more you keep dancing around the question without answering it is proof enough about what you really think.
Also as others said since Barzal and Laine play on different teams they can never be a duo, considering that Matthews and Marner play on the same team. Based on that fact alone Matthews and Marner should have won this poll in a landslide.
You think he's peaked as a 20 year old rookie?
Do you also think Marner has peaked?
The more you keep dancing around the question without answering it is proof enough about what you really think.
Also as others said since Barzal and Laine play on different teams they can never be a duo, considering that Matthews and Marner play on the same team. Based on that fact alone Matthews and Marner should have won this poll in a landslide.
Also as others said since Barzal and Laine play on different teams they can never be a duo, considering that Matthews and Marner play on the same team. Based on that fact alone Matthews and Marner should have won this poll in a landslide.
Do you not realize that anytime he wants Mike Babcock can put Matthews and Marner on the same line together. So I'm still correct about what I previously said since they play on the same NHL team.You can't even get that right. Matthews and Marner don't even play on the same line and they are on the same team. Now coach Babcock who you said is a very smart coach has decided this. So your point is not a good one. It doesn't take much imagination on how Laine and Barzal would benefit each other. Best shooter and goal scorer in this thread playing with the best playmaker and chance generating Center on this thread. 1+1 = Barzal and Laine. Easy decision.
What I'm saying is it's stupid to not select Matthews or Marner because they play on the same team and could possibly play together on the same line. With Barzal and Laine or McDavid and Kucherov that's all fan fiction since they play on different teams and can not be a duo.Huh?
So Kadri - Marleau is also a better duo than McDavid - Kucherov because they play on the same team?
I don't understand the logic.
There are often polls made on this very board with combinations of players from different teams.
What I'm saying is it's stupid to not select Matthews or Marner because they play on the same team and could possibly play together on the same line. With Barzal and Laine or McDavid and Kucherov that's all fan fiction since they play on different teams and can not be a duo.
Do you not realize that anytime he wants Mike Babcock can put Matthews and Marner on the same line together. So I'm still correct about what I previously said since they play on the same NHL team.
I hope Laine and Barzal playing on this magical team together have a really defensively responsible Left Winger.
I hope Laine and Barzal playing on this magical team together have a really defensively responsible Left Winger.
Based on my viewings, Laine is prone to the odd brain fart and bad giveaway, but is often the first man back, and is more than fine defensively.
Yeah tbh I didn't give Laine enough credit his defensive game has really improved this year.Based on my viewings, Laine is prone to the odd brain fart and bad giveaway, but is often the first man back, and is more than fine defensively.