So, anytime that anybody has brought forward a "Jets have a winning record with so-and-so out of the lineup" posting, they have been immediately shouted down with reasons why there is no cause and effect relationship there, but now it's just a given that the team will start winning more entirely from Stu's absence?
Yup, okay then.
It's usually when discussion of a typically net-positive contributor (Buff, Scheif, Enstrom, et al) goes out of the line-up. Stuart is arguably a net negative, depending on his usage. No slight against Stuart on my part - I question Maurice's usage more than anything else.