I was also going to say that I don't project either as a top 6 ceiling player, as of today. Middle 6 complimentary player feels better to say. I'm still a big fan of JAD, despite the u18s, but I'm not convinced he even goes in the 1st on draft day. Ratcliffe meanwhile feels more certain. He could even be reached on too and not be there in the mid-late 20s. GMs don't mess around when they see a 6'6" plus skater with great compete and IQ and a hard shot. JAD also is a plus skater with great compete and IQ and a quick shot, but though he's solid defensively at center IMO, I think he's more projectable at wing. I also think he has a bit more skill and is a better stick handler than Ratcliffe, who can get bobbly at times with the puck. I could see Ratcliffe playing on the PP2 as a net front guy (maybe even PP1 which would elevate his scoring potential) pretty easily; I think JAD could be on a PP2 but in a slot/bumper role.........but will the GM take the 6'6" player described or the 5'11" player described?
I have them a handful+ spots apart from each other, but teams covet size and they're probably not crazy for thinking the 6'6" kid is more easily projectable as an NHL player. Leaving undersized JAD to go in the 2nd.