TheCoach
Registered User
- Sep 17, 2014
- 2,485
- 2,784
reason???they got beat they weren't dominated still to early to sellsell!
reason???they got beat they weren't dominated still to early to sellsell!
Its just a matter of time before he comes backApparently montreal had mete playing the wing tuesday night NOT on D
Very interestingApparently montreal had mete playing the wing tuesday night NOT on D
I still doubt itIts just a matter of time before he comes back
Well quite possibly but as someone who's watched every game he's played, he looked quite good on the wing, creating a couple of scoring chances and making an excellent pass. I honestly think Habs aren't deep enough on D at this time for sure to send him back. Should be a great addition if he plays for Team Canada and he would have a heck of an impact for the Knights should he come back. He is one rare player to be able to stick at this level at his age, especially on D. How many seasons did he play for the Knights? Only two?Its just a matter of time before he comes back
Well quite possibly but as someone who's watched every game he's played, he looked quite good on the wing, creating a couple of scoring chances and making an excellent pass. I honestly think Habs aren't deep enough on D at this time for sure to send him back. Should be a great addition if he plays for Team Canada and he would have a heck of an impact for the Knights should he come back. He is one rare player to be able to stick at this level at his age, especially on D. How many seasons did he play for the Knights? Only two?
Can they not send Mete to Brampton if they send him down at all but judging from the comments from Montreal he going nowhere
Can they not send Mete to Brampton if they send him down at all but judging from the comments from Montreal he going nowhere
If Mete comes back, I can see this turning into a go-for-it year.
Market is too over-flooded to get good value for our assets.
I can not remember London draft pick cupboard but will going for it this year hurt the team down the road like it can hurt Windsor.
Going for it if Mete returns and I doubt he does,would be a terrible mistake.
Even with Mete London needs 2D and 3 forwards to challenge,plus with the OHL sending only 1 rep to the Mem Cup this year,even more challenging.Toss in the fact,that Robert Thomas probably makes the NHL next year, assuming he continues to improve,the future is very bleak.
London with the early pro graduation of Kaukkonen,Mete and Juolevi are last year's Sarnia, who lost 3 players early and finished 8th.In fact and though I think it won't happen,if the playoffs started today London would miss the playoffs based on today's standings and win percentage.
If anyone thinks this year is bad, wait till next, doesn't project well currently.
Thanks. So I guess a 16 yr old rookie has the potential to play five years if he's an OA?Mete played 3 years with London
Not sure if you are aware that 11 of the other forwards besides the 5 that you mentioned have a combined total of 16 goals,yes 16 goals in 19 games,Toss in the fact that Miletic has only 4 goals,Pu 5 and he hasn't been the same player since almost a year ago,Jones is a suspension waiting to happen,seems to be going for the Cy Young award 8G,1A,only Formenton and Thomas seem to be reliable with any consistency.We'll see. They've played quite well since even before Formenton/Raaymakers. Definitely much better than their record would indicate. I disagree with your evaluation of needing 3F and 2D.
Jones/Pu/Thomas/Formenton/Miletic is as good a top 5 forward group as any in the league.
I'm pretty happy with Bouchard/Regula/Collins down the right side. Mete would slide in at the top pair LHD and play 35-40 minutes a game, so one LHD could be enough.
The upcoming stretch of games will provide a good indication.
Next year does not project that well but I'm not convinced that selling off our top guys this year will give us enough to make us contenders next year. The year after, Bouchard's gone.