Confirmed with Link: Leafs acquire Pickard

Slot

Registered User
Mar 6, 2012
2,691
198
Time to bring Pickard up and let him start. Give the team a chance at least.

Id wait until McelHinney loses, no need to rush, Pickard will get his chance after January to play games with the Leafs.

What is wrong with you two? Pickard passed through waivers. 29 other teams didn't think he'd be enough of an improvement on even their backup that and you're trying to make him a starter? Give your heads a shake.
 

MR4

Registered User
Oct 20, 2014
6,270
2,253
What is wrong with you two? Pickard passed through waivers. 29 other teams didn't think he'd be enough of an improvement on even their backup that and you're trying to make him a starter? Give your heads a shake.
Marty St Louis wasn't even drafted, TBL were idiots to play him in 1000 games
 

Slot

Registered User
Mar 6, 2012
2,691
198
Marty St Louis wasn't even drafted, TBL were idiots to play him in 1000 games

That's an asinine statement of equivalency. Calvin Pickard isn't an unknown quantity. MSL was an undersized kid who was passed over despite his evident skill because at the time the NHL was a league dominated by hulking power forwards and everyone thought he wouldn't survive.
 

Suntouchable13

Registered User
Dec 20, 2003
43,317
18,589
Toronto, ON
Andersen has not played poorly at all. Again, the defensive play of this team is pretty bad. He can only do so much. 17 scoring chances against in last night's game. Way too many.
 

smitty10

Registered User
Aug 6, 2009
9,805
2,647
Toronto
Subban went down last night for Vegas. They're going to need a stop gap while Fleury and Subban recover. Maybe we can get rid of McElhinney.
 

A1LeafNation

Obsession beats talent everytime!!
Oct 17, 2010
27,399
17,343
What is wrong with you two? Pickard passed through waivers. 29 other teams didn't think he'd be enough of an improvement on even their backup that and you're trying to make him a starter? Give your heads a shake.

How'd you get he'd be a starter from what I said.

Teams passed on him because it was 2 games into the season and all teams had their goalies and commitments to them set.
 

CantLoseWithMatthews

Registered User
Sep 28, 2015
49,694
59,401
The thought of Pickard being any better than Andersen with the amount of high impact scoring chances our D gives up is "the grass is always greener" at its best.
Yep. I don't love Andersen but he gives us the best chance to win any given night better than anyone in our system by a longshot
 

Slot

Registered User
Mar 6, 2012
2,691
198
How'd you get he'd be a starter from what I said.

Teams passed on him because it was 2 games into the season and all teams had their goalies and commitments to them set.

Horse pucks. He was passed on by every team because he had just been replaced on an EXPANSION team by Malcom Subban. A goalie with a grand total of 2 NHL games of experience to that point. He was replaced by a rookie. And deemed not good enough to be the back up goalie on a first year expansion team.
 

Menzinger

Kessel4LadyByng
Apr 24, 2014
41,155
32,798
St. Paul, MN
How'd you get he'd be a starter from what I said.

Teams passed on him because it was 2 games into the season and all teams had their goalies and commitments to them set.

Exactly. He's got huge potentia, but to claim a player off waivers you are then forced to dress them. Just because a team (or teams) were unsure if a prospect is 100% NHL ready and thus pass on picking him from waivers doesn't then mean he's not a smart investment
 

A1LeafNation

Obsession beats talent everytime!!
Oct 17, 2010
27,399
17,343
Horse pucks. He was passed on by every team because he had just been replaced on an EXPANSION team by Malcom Subban. A goalie with a grand total of 2 NHL games of experience to that point. He was replaced by a rookie. And deemed not good enough to be the back up goalie on a first year expansion team.

Do some research on the Vegas goalie coach. Subban is a work in progress and they like his tool box. That's on Boston not recgnizing it, not on pickard.
 

Slot

Registered User
Mar 6, 2012
2,691
198
Do some research on the Vegas goalie coach. Subban is a work in progress and they like his tool box. That's on Boston not recgnizing it, not on pickard.

So Subban, whom you admit is a work in progress, is worth more than Pickard. Yet the latter should get starts ahead of two bonafide NHL goalies? You've really tripled down on this lunacy.
 

A1LeafNation

Obsession beats talent everytime!!
Oct 17, 2010
27,399
17,343
So Subban, whom you admit is a work in progress, is worth more than Pickard. Yet the latter should get starts ahead of two bonafide NHL goalies? You've really tripled down on this lunacy.
One of them not two.
 

4thline

Registered User
Jul 18, 2014
14,378
9,688
Waterloo
So Subban, whom you admit is a work in progress, is worth more than Pickard. Yet the latter should get starts ahead of two bonafide NHL goalies? You've really tripled down on this lunacy.

Single team preference =/= more value. Vegas like the combo of Subban + Lindberg + 6th more than Pickard. Other team weren't willing to upset their goaltending situations to claim him. Those were decisions, time will tell if they were good ones. But Pickard's NHL track record is very similar to that of goalies traded for 1st round picks in the last few years.

The idea that he should start over Andersen is crazy, but your inference on his ability and value based the events surrounding his acquisition is well, simple to put it somewhat politely.
 

Slot

Registered User
Mar 6, 2012
2,691
198
Single team preference =/= more value. Vegas like the combo of Subban + Lindberg + 6th more than Pickard. Other team weren't willing to upset their goaltending situations to claim him. Those were decisions, time will tell if they were good ones. But Pickard's NHL track record is very similar to that of goalies traded for 1st round picks in the last few years.

The idea that he should start over Andersen is crazy, but your inference on his ability and value based the events surrounding his acquisition is well, simple to put it somewhat politely.

You have no idea what I think of the Pickard trade. I haven't mentioned it. I think it's a good move for the future and at present it is insurance if Andersen goes down for an extended period a tandem of Pickard and McElhinney is a hell of a lot more reassuring than McElhinney and Sparks. But the fact remains that currently it is insane to expect Pickard to go ahead of either of our two goalies.

No one was interested when he was on waivers and it didn't take the moon to get him. It's not rocket surgery to realise that he's nowhere close to NHL ready.
 

4thline

Registered User
Jul 18, 2014
14,378
9,688
Waterloo
No one was interested when he was on waivers and it didn't take the moon to get him. It's not rocket surgery to realise that he's nowhere close to NHL ready.

This what I mean by simple. Assessing a goalies ability based on waiver claims and trade value withouttaking other factors into account.

The guys has a 2.77 and .914 over 86 games since coming into the league, 39th highest save percentage in the league for goalies with 20 or more games in that timespan. He's a young + level backup with starting potential, and the second best goalie in our organization.
 

Menzinger

Kessel4LadyByng
Apr 24, 2014
41,155
32,798
St. Paul, MN
Vegas' asset management has been very questionable as of late. I'm not so sure we should just differ to them putting him in waivers as any sort of accurate gauge of his current skillset
 
  • Like
Reactions: New Leaf

rt

The Kinder, Gentler Version
May 13, 2004
97,458
46,372
A Rockwellian Pleasantville
Proposal

To TOR:
Louis Domingue

To ARI:
Curtis McElhinney

Louis once had very good potential. He's been a train wreck in Raanta's absence. Probably an elite AHL goalie, though. Gives the Leafs a chance to call up Pickard and give the Marlies a solid replacement. Gives the Yotes a solid, experienced vet to stabilize things a little.

Thoughts?
 

Anthrax442

Registered User
Aug 4, 2008
15,418
7,660
Toronto
www.russianroulette.ca
Proposal

To TOR:
Louis Domingue

To ARI:
Curtis McElhinney

Louis once had very good potential. He's been a train wreck in Raanta's absence. Probably an elite AHL goalie, though. Gives the Leafs a chance to call up Pickard and give the Marlies a solid replacement. Gives the Yotes a solid, experienced vet to stabilize things a little.

Thoughts?

I think the whole idea behind Mac was his experience with being a backup. They like him. We have 2 good AHL goalies, why add another one?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad