AHB*
Guest
I love when people bring up points to argue in favor of a D-Man. Why dont' we just sign Sheldon Souray while we're at it?
I'd take Hunwick over Kostka easily. I don't see a compelling reason other than injury to even be kicking Kaberle's tires. I think we'll be fine with Staal, Girardi, Boyle, Klein, Moore and Hunwick until McDonagh gets back. If Kostka clears waivers which would probably be best he'd be a potential call up along with Allen with McIlrath. Unless Kaberle can step right into the Rangers lineup--at his age I don't think there's any point in signing him otherwise.
I love when people bring up points to argue in favor of a D-Man. Why dont' we just sign Sheldon Souray while we're at it?
Dat slapshot.I love when people bring up points to argue in favor of a D-Man. Why dont' we just sign Sheldon Souray while we're at it?
kostka wasnt good. his days were numbered.
kaberle would be perhaps worse but whats it gonna hurt giving him a looksee.
all i know is last time i saw tk, he looked done. over. finished
hes slooooowwwwwww and with boyle back, i dont see the need for him whatsoever.
like i said before, once mcd returns healthy and returns to his old self and not the massive suckage mcdonagh we saw early this season, i really like our defense.
mcd girardi
staal boyle
moore klein
hunwick
looks nice.
kleins emergence and boyles return should make this unit of 6 pretty solid.
I'd be curious to see if J. Moore gets dealt in an attempt to upgrade at center. Hunwick has been solid.
AV seems very happy with Moore the last two games--he played the most minutes of any player last night (and also played well over 20 minutes the game before).
I'm not the biggest fan of Moore--but I just don't see why everyone is so taken by Hunwick. He's a 29 year old who hasn't been good enough in his NHL career to get into the lineup on a regular basis and stick (at least since he was in Boston). He hasn't played in the playoffs since 2010. And now the Rangers are going to trade a 23 year old defenseman so Hunwick can play regularly? Give me a break.
I'll take Moore any day of the week and twice on Sunday over Hunwick. It's very clear the organizational depth on defense is not what some people thought at the beginning of the season. I don't think Moore's spot in the lineup is in danger.
I was impressed with Hunwick in a couple of games until this weekend and thereafter. Thought Hunwick sucked in pre-season, shaky a couple of games and then really came on. But he went back to being what he was.
JMoore is a good player with great tools, but never took the step, but someone that I viewed as a great trade chip to fill needs up front or stack up the D-Core, but I don't think you move him now. Can ill-afford not not have a strong D.
JMoore still needs to win more net front battles, but I think he fits well with Boyle as his partner. Generated a lot of good shots and transition.
AV seems very happy with Moore the last two games--he played the most minutes of any player last night (and also played well over 20 minutes the game before).
I'm not the biggest fan of Moore--but I just don't see why everyone is so taken by Hunwick. He's a 29 year old who hasn't been good enough in his NHL career to get into the lineup on a regular basis and stick (at least since he was in Boston). He hasn't played in the playoffs since 2010. And now the Rangers are going to trade a 23 year old defenseman so Hunwick can play regularly? Give me a break.
I'll take Moore any day of the week and twice on Sunday over Hunwick. It's very clear the organizational depth on defense is not what some people thought at the beginning of the season. I don't think Moore's spot in the lineup is in danger.