Komisarek versus Every Other Defenceman...

Status
Not open for further replies.

triggrman

Where is Hipcheck85
Sponsor
May 8, 2002
31,717
7,490
Murfreesboro, TN
hfboards.com
montreal said:
Not really, saying Eaton is better then Markov is funny and insulting to Markov. Saying Markov is better then Eaton is an opinion based in reality. I know Eaton is the pride of Delaware, but Markov was the top defensemen in Russia before coming over, and one of the better young defensemen in the game.

Really, tell me what type of defenseman Mark Eaton is. Tell me his pluses and minus. Is he an offensive defenseman? Can he shut down top forwards?
 

Enoch

This is my boomstick
Jul 2, 2003
14,249
897
Cookeville TN
db23 said:
Komisarek was head and shoulders above Hamhuis in the AHL when they were both rooks there. Once Mike plays regular minutes in Montreal (which he would have this season) he will be the better NHL defenceman as well.

He played regular minutes in the NHL and was considerably worse than Dan Hamhuis at an older age. Your points are indefensible and lack substance. Use something to back up your biased opinions for once. Even though I am a Nashville fan, I at least acknowledge that to have a reasonable debate - one has to offer up something signficant. The only thing you offer up is statistics from inferior leagues, which are often out-dated an irrelevant to the discussion, and to be blunt, Hamhuis was no slouch in the leagues he played in either.

As for the depth situation in Montreal, give me a break. Rookie mistakes or not, if a player is significantly better than those in front of him, the coach is going to play him. When you have veterans that are, let me phrase this nicely, awful, then it should really be of no consequence when a youthful player steps up and overtakes them. In fact, it should be welcomed. However, if the youthful player is relatively on par with the bad veterans, THEN you start the veteran ;). I think this has been the case with Komisarek thus far, at least, according to Hab fans, until the playoffs where he supposedly stepped up his game.
 

montreal

Go Habs Go
Mar 21, 2002
57,624
40,716
www.youtube.com
triggrman said:
Because Mike plays for the Habs and they get no respect, especially when compared to Nashville



Just stick to hockey please it's not hard to do. Any scout with his weight in salt will tell you both Komisarek and Hamhuis are very good prospects, don't take some posters opinions personally and think it's an attack on Nashville, and vice verse, no need to take shots at the Habs because you disagree with a few posters.
 

montreal

Go Habs Go
Mar 21, 2002
57,624
40,716
www.youtube.com
triggrman said:
Really, tell me what type of defenseman Mark Eaton is. Tell me his pluses and minus. Is he an offensive defenseman? Can he shut down top forwards?


Eaton is an offensive defensemen, no he can't shut down top line forwards due to a lack of upper body strength. He's mistake prone in his own end, although a good skater and a decent shot. Should put up the points but not a guy you want late in the game to hold a lead. I was surprised the flyers moved him, as I thought they could use his offensive game.
 

triggrman

Where is Hipcheck85
Sponsor
May 8, 2002
31,717
7,490
Murfreesboro, TN
hfboards.com
montreal said:
Just stick to hockey please it's not hard to do. Any scout with his weight in salt will tell you both Komisarek and Hamhuis are very good prospects, don't take some posters opinions personally and think it's an attack on Nashville, and vice verse, no need to take shots at the Habs because you disagree with a few posters.
417 TO MTL said:
...

The point is, had Komisarek been drafted by Nashville and Hamhuis by Montreal, we'd be talking about Hamhuis being overrated .....


I'm sorry, what did you say?

Now on to Eaton.

Eaton is Nashville's top defensive defenseman, this past year. He's on of the strongest players on the team thanks to offseason work outs that added close to 20 pounds of weight. He was our shut down guy, and was never used in an offensive role.

Thanks for playing.
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
53,595
84,103
Vancouver, BC
montreal said:
Not really, saying Eaton is better then Markov is funny and insulting to Markov. Saying Markov is better then Eaton is an opinion based in reality. I know Eaton is the pride of Delaware, but Markov was the top defensemen in Russia before coming over, and one of the better young defensemen in the game.

I don't think you're terribly familiar with the way Eaton played last season for Nashville if you think any comparison between them is 'funny'. Both guys averaged 21 min/game as #3 defenders for their respective teams. Markov is much better offensively. Eaton is much, much better defensively. He's big, skates well, is exceptionally poised, and just doesn't make mistakes at all (or at least it seems like it) despite playing against the opposition's top lines most nights. Something like a younger Keith Carney. If I had to choose between adding Markov or Eaton to my team, I'd take Eaton in a heartbeat.
 

montreal

Go Habs Go
Mar 21, 2002
57,624
40,716
www.youtube.com
triggrman said:
I'm sorry, what did you say?

Now on to Eaton.

Eaton is Nashville's top defensive defenseman, this past year. He's on of the strongest players on the team thanks to offseason work outs that added close to 20 pounds of weight. He was our shut down guy, and was never used in an offensive role.

Thanks for playing.


Not the Eaton I saw in philly. I live outside and philly and I'm from Delaware, so I known of Eaton for some time. If he's your top defensive defensemen then either he improved a ton since his philly days or your team is lacking a true defensive defensemen. As for one of the strongest, his body frame doesn't look all that imposing, so I don't see how he got that much stronger physically, cause that's very tough to do.

If you think Eaton is anywhere near Markov good for you, but unless he's improved about 150%, I doubt it.
 

Enoch

This is my boomstick
Jul 2, 2003
14,249
897
Cookeville TN
montreal said:
Eaton is an offensive defensemen, no he can't shut down top line forwards due to a lack of upper body strength. He's mistake prone in his own end, although a good skater and a decent shot. Should put up the points but not a guy you want late in the game to hold a lead. I was surprised the flyers moved him, as I thought they could use his offensive game.

Ironically, he has become our rock defensively. Last year, I would agree with your assumption, but this year he evolved into a true shut-down defenseman...one the Preds sorely lack. He bulked up about 15-20 pounds before the start of last year, and he was able to handle the bigger opponents. His offensive game, remained largely unused (which is another irony), as he was paired with Kimmo and told to focus on defense. That being said, he is pretty good offensively (after all that was his original strength). If there is a knock against him, I would say that although good at shutting down offensive players, he is still not bulky enough to clear the crease. Actually, no one on the Predators could really clear the crease last year until we acquired Shane Hnidy ;). Still, defensively he was almost unmatched on the Preds last year, and physically he could contain the larger players in the league with an ability that we really haven't had in Nashville up to this point. I would go so far to say that he was one of the main reasons we were able to make the playoffs as a team. Otherwise, we would have been unable as a defense to stop the opposing teams top lines.
 
Last edited:

montreal

Go Habs Go
Mar 21, 2002
57,624
40,716
www.youtube.com
MS said:
I don't think you're terribly familiar with the way Eaton played last season for Nashville if you think any comparison between them is 'funny'. Both guys averaged 21 min/game as #3 defenders for their respective teams. Markov is much better offensively. Eaton is much, much better defensively. He's big, skates well, is exceptionally poised, and just doesn't make mistakes at all (or at least it seems like it) despite playing against the opposition's top lines most nights. Something like a younger Keith Carney. If I had to choose between adding Markov or Eaton to my team, I'd take Eaton in a heartbeat.



Good for you, that you like Eaton. Maybe he got a hell of a lot better then his philly days, but Markov is our #1 guy and is also very good in his own end. I don't think Eaton is much much better then Markov, as he was prone to mistakes in his own end, whereas Markov is an excellent stick checker and reads plays very well.
 

db23

Guest
Komisarek made the NHL before Hamhuis did, if you want to go that route. When the Habs defence was hit by injuries they called him up in February of 2003 and he played 21 games while Hamhuis was still struggling in the AHL. Last season, the Montreal defence was healthy for most of the year, the only player to miss significant time was left side defenceman Souray. As a result, Komisarek averaged only 12 minutes a game in about half a season's worth of games. He did beat out two veterans who were starters on two other teams beside Montreal in Dykhuis and Traverse. Dykhuis was a starter in Chicago and Philadelphia before coming to Montreal. Traverse was a starter in Ottawa and Boston before coming to Montreal. Both were sent to the AHL even though they had one way contracts. So was Ron Hainsey who was an All American, AHL All Star and AHL All Rookie selection prior to joining the Habs. Komisarek also earned both nominations as a rookie (All Star starter) and was an AHL All Star again last season despite just playing 18 games in Hamilton. He was also selected as the Sporting News and Hockey News Minor League Player of the Year after the 2002-2003 season. I don't think Hamhuis won any awards or made any select teams in the AHL.
 

montreal

Go Habs Go
Mar 21, 2002
57,624
40,716
www.youtube.com
Enoch said:
Ironically, he has become our rock defensively. Last year, I would agree with your assumption, but this year he evolved into a true shut-down defenseman...one the Preds sorely lack. He bulked up about 15-20 pounds before the start of last year, and he was able to handle the bigger opponents. His offensive game, remained largely unused (which is another irony), as he was paired with Kimmo and told to focus on defense. That being said, he is pretty good offensively (after all that was his original strength). If there is a knock against him, I would say that although good at shutting down offensive players, he is still not bulky enough to clear the crease. Actually, no one on the Predators could really clear the crease last year until we acquired Shane Hnidy ;). Still, defensively he was almost unmatched on the Preds last year, and physically he could contain the larger players in the league.

Then I stand corrected, if he really did improve that much over one year. Anytime I saw Nashville, he didn't look bigger or stonger to me, and being as though I live in Delaware I usually hear a lot about him since he's one of the only guys to ever make the NHL from the first state.
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
53,595
84,103
Vancouver, BC
montreal said:
Good for you, that you like Eaton. Maybe he got a hell of a lot better then his philly days, but Markov is our #1 guy and is also very good in his own end. I don't think Eaton is much much better then Markov, as he was prone to mistakes in his own end, whereas Markov is an excellent stick checker and reads plays very well.

He is a hell of a lot better than in Philly. I thought he was s*** prior to this year, too. But he was absolutely terrific for Nashville last year, and I'd take the sort of play he showed over Markov's game any day of the week.

It happens - Souray didn't do much of anything prior to last season to show he was anything more than an injury-prone third-pairing banger. Same sort of turnaround happened with Eaton.
 

Sammy*

Guest
db23 said:
Komisarek made the NHL before Hamhuis did, if you want to go that route. When the Habs defence was hit by injuries they called him up in February of 2003 and he played 21 games while Hamhuis was still struggling in the AHL. Last season, the Montreal defence was healthy for most of the year, the only player to miss significant time was left side defenceman Souray. As a result, Komisarek averaged only 12 minutes a game in about half a season's worth of games. He did beat out two veterans who were starters on two other teams beside Montreal in Dykhuis and Traverse. Dykhuis was a starter in Chicago and Philadelphia before coming to Montreal. Traverse was a starter in Ottawa and Boston before coming to Montreal. Both were sent to the AHL even though they had one way contracts. So was Ron Hainsey who was an All American, AHL All Star and AHL All Rookie selection prior to joining the Habs. Komisarek also earned both nominations as a rookie (All Star starter) and was an AHL All Star again last season despite just playing 18 games in Hamilton. He was also selected as the Sporting News and Hockey News Minor League Player of the Year after the 2002-2003 season. I don't think Hamhuis won any awards or made any select teams in the AHL.
Now I know why the Habs stole & drafted Corey Locke. Cause he was the CHL player of the year & sure to be a star in the NHL cause of all the awards he has accumulated.
 

montreal

Go Habs Go
Mar 21, 2002
57,624
40,716
www.youtube.com
MS said:
He is a hell of a lot better than in Philly. I thought he was s*** prior to this year, too. But he was absolutely terrific for Nashville last year, and I'd take the sort of play he showed over Markov's game any day of the week.

It happens - Souray didn't do much of anything prior to last season to show he was anything more than an injury-prone third-pairing banger. Same sort of turnaround happened with Eaton.


Souray showed flashes but couldn't stay healthy. In '02 he was great in the playoffs against Boston and especially Thorton. I do see now that Eaton had a great season numbers wise, but that's one good season. Mike Ribeiro had a great season to, but it doesn't make him that much better, as one season can be a fluke. Not saying it will or won't be since we likely won't be seeing any hockey for a long long time anyways.

I still can't see how Eaton is that much better then Markov in his own, as Markov did regress at the start of the year (his dad died early on in the year) but aside from numbers, Markov is very good and to me the guy I want out there to hold a lead late in the game. If Eaton has improved this much and can continue this way, that's great for him, Nashville and Delaware since they could use a guy in the NHL.
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
53,595
84,103
Vancouver, BC
montreal said:
Hainsey didn't get 15-18 mintues on the 3rd pairing, in any of the games I recall, but he did struggle with some poor turnovers and questionable pinching.

Icetime after making the team out of training camp, 2002:

17:45
12:02
14:11
16:25
15:30

He goes -5 in those 5 games, sees his icetime cut roughly in half for another stretch of games, then is sent back to the AHL.

Icetime after making team out of training camp, 2003:

18:59
15:20
16:53
14:23
16:24

Struggles with the problems you mention, sees his icetime cut back, and then spends the rest of the year in the AHL.

Hainsey's struggles to stick have nothing to do with opportunity and everything to do with performance. In each of the last two years, he's been given a roster spot out of training camp and 15+ minutes of icetime to work with, and then proceeded to struggle with those responsibilities. Montreal is not trying to bring him along slowly, he's just developing slowly.
 

Beukeboom Fan

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
15,429
1,213
Chicago, IL
Visit site
db23 said:
Teams don't just toss aside proven veterans and popular team leaders if a rook comes along and has a few good games. Not in Montreal anyway. There are a lot of different considerations as to the overall makeup of the team.

It wouldn't have anything to do with the likelyhood that you would have a hard time giving Rivet or Brisebois away with their current contracts?
 

nomorekids

The original, baby
Feb 28, 2003
33,375
107
Nashville, TN
www.twitter.com
montreal said:
Then I stand corrected, if he really did improve that much over one year. Anytime I saw Nashville, he didn't look bigger or stonger to me, and being as though I live in Delaware I usually hear a lot about him since he's one of the only guys to ever make the NHL from the first state.


that's kind of the problem. You're basing your judgement of Mark Eaton on what you KNEW of him...and Mark Eaton, in ONE SUMMER took such a huge step forward that even PREDS fans couldn't believe it. He went from being referred to as "Question Mark" and being called to be sent to the AHL...to being our absolute best defensive d-man. He was called upon to bulk up..he did. He was called upon to hit the weight room....he did that to the point that he turned down an offer to play for the US world championship team just so that he could do nothing but get stronger. He was called upon to go from being an offensive defenseman and turn to being a strictly stay at home guy, so that he could be paired with Timonen. What did he have last year? 15 points? and yet he somehow managed to set a Nashville record with a PLUS SIXTEEN rating. He was out EVERY night against the top lines, and shut down the likes of Naslund, Tkachuk, Bertuzzi and so forth. He was not only "prone to making mistakes in his own end," he almost never did. I can't actually think of one noticeable "bad play" he made...all of last year. So..unless you watched him a good amount last year...it's unfair to judge him, because there really was that much of a difference. I will go as far as to say... Eaton is the best PURELY DEFENSIVE d-man on either team, Nashville or Montreal. You can go on about how Markov will put better numbers up..and he will...but if you want a shut down guy, Eaton is the man for either team.
 

db23

Guest
Don't be so hard on Leopold. Not that there is anything wrong with a Chevette. Handy, economical, little units. I realize that Jordan was probably a lot cheaper to "run" as a "second hand", second round pick, but he does the job to the best of his ability.
 

Flames Draft Watcher

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
4,793
0
Calgary
Visit site
db23 said:
Neither Pitkanen nor Leopold would be playing regularly for the Habs either. Ron Hainsey is better than Leopold. As an NCAA soph, prior to turning pro, Hainsey was much better than Leopold. During the playoffs, Komisarek was playing more minutes per game than Pitkanen, who was strictly an offensive specialist.

Being an effective NHL defenseman is not simply taking the puck and rushing it up the ice, which is what the three you mention do most of the time.

Try watching hockey sometime. You are really embarassing yourself and Habs fans with comments like this. Either you're a complete homer or you just don't have a clue at all about players like Leopold and Pitkanen.

What a joke.....you are.
 

db23

Guest
Flames Draft Watcher said:
What a joke.....QUOTE]
Niklas Sundblad, Jesper Mattson, Chris O'Sullivan, Pavel Smirnov, Travis Bigley, Chris Dingman, Daniel Tkachuk, Brent Krahn, Oleg Saprykin, Chuck Kobasew.....

No wonder you're a bitter person.... :D
 

montreal

Go Habs Go
Mar 21, 2002
57,624
40,716
www.youtube.com
MS said:
Icetime after making the team out of training camp, 2002:

17:45
12:02
14:11
16:25
15:30

He goes -5 in those 5 games, sees his icetime cut roughly in half for another stretch of games, then is sent back to the AHL.

Icetime after making team out of training camp, 2003:

18:59
15:20
16:53
14:23
16:24

Struggles with the problems you mention, sees his icetime cut back, and then spends the rest of the year in the AHL.

Hainsey's struggles to stick have nothing to do with opportunity and everything to do with performance. In each of the last two years, he's been given a roster spot out of training camp and 15+ minutes of icetime to work with, and then proceeded to struggle with those responsibilities. Montreal is not trying to bring him along slowly, he's just developing slowly.


I should have looked up his ice times. In '02, those numbers average 15:02 and in '03 16:16. I do agre he is developing slowly cause he doesn't seem to have the smarts to match his skills. My bad on the ice time, I never thought he saw over 16 minutes a game, I was wrong there as he did a few times.
 

db23

Guest
Sammy said:
Now I know why the Habs stole & drafted Corey Locke. Cause he was the CHL player of the year & sure to be a star in the NHL cause of all the awards he has accumulated.
Without a doubt. Thanks for the affirmation, Sammy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad