SoundAndFury
Registered User
- May 28, 2012
- 11,351
- 5,305
It is fair to everyone because the player isn't club's property. He was paid a salary to pay for the club. Once he did that he's free to pursue whatever he wants. That's how Bosman rule came to existence in the first place. You don't own the person just because you paid him a salary for some fraction of time.How is it fair to the club if club´s chances to get a transfer fee is equal to zero? Whom is it fair to?
What you said is an opinion of people who care only about players, they do not care at all about hockey development in the world.
And what is the evidence the way you imagine things is any better than the way I do? How are you so certain this revolution of yours would help hockey development instead of hurting it?
Yeah that's what best on best competitions are for. Local leagues are like choir boys playing because only boys from that village are allowed to participate. And way bigger village will have a way better after the mass league because they produce way more candy to give out after the game.Players play sport to be better than their peers, teams assemble the best players to be better than other teams, and leagues fight so that the best teams would have the better players to be better than other leagues.
This is professional sports. Not choir boys playing baseball after the mass on sundays.
That's why national teams came to existence in the first place, when people realized you can't get everyone playing for the same club. Or tie them to a local league. And since there are national teams, there is no need for clubs to try and be super very extremely best. Naturally, nations whose NTs stink maybe feel they are left by the waistline by the system which works for others and are looking for someone to blame.