If I know Yugra has NO problem with financing, so no problem here. Even Novokuznetsk was OK this season from financial point of view.
I will write how I see the latest development. Of course I can be wrong.
Lets sum it up:
- KHL has 29 teams, 22 from Russia. Cheryshenko said that 30 or 32 is maximum.
- KHL has applications from "several" teams from Europe and Asia
- KHL is working on new 7 year development strategy
- Chernyshenko said that contraction of teams is one of possible scenarios for the league
- Russian media reported that KHL is working on 26 teams schedule for next season
New Strategy will consist of various scenarios for development of Russian hockey (not only KHL´s) for next five to seven years. If KHL wants to keep expanding, some teams have to leave. So the league has to consider what teams are not attractive for the league from long term perspective. So you compare attendance, arena, tv demand and quality of broadcasting, city, financing of a club including the decrease of state funding, growing potential of a club, results on the ice etc. IMO the list of teams which can leave the league - Vityaz, Severstal, Lada (?), Neftekhimik, Yugra, Novokuznetsk. If we look at them closely, Vityaz has special connections, Severstal has solid results from latest seasons, Neftekhimik is from Tatarstan with good hockey support, Yugra has nothing, Novokuznetsk have always had problems (yes, they have developed many good players). Yugra and Novokuznetsk are leading teams for contraction, Neftekhimik, Severstal and Vityaz is second wave. I am not sure about Lada. We will see if the KHL has the same opinion. It is not easy decision.