If Philly has the number one pick, I believe their choice will bebetween Turris and Kane. GM Paul Homgren in a recent interview spoke rather glowingly of both prospects, saying that Kane had some Crosby like qualities (not calling him another Crosby though) and that Turris was a complete player who would score alot and be responsible defensively. I gathered from his Turris comments that Turris is a more complete and better defensive player than Kane, but Kane more physically (Turris with very skinny legs and frail looking) mature and higher skilled offensively. He dismissed Cherepanov as being great on any given night and missing on others, and Espo as an underachiever. Vorachek, JVR and Alzner never came up. My question is, what are the differences between Turris and Kane? Turris is a smallish 6 footer but Kane is what 5'9? Is there an advantage there? Which player is better in shootouts? This is very important as the Flyers lose shootouts all of the time. Which player has the higher offensive upside? Is Turris substantially better than Kane defensively? Which player is more aggresive? Which one has more hockey sense? Which has better leadership skills? All input is appreciated, what are your thoughts, and have you seen both players (you needn't have seen them to have an opinion that can be formulated through hearsay and reading).