One thing I've been thinking about because of Brazal and Ho-Sang is the possibility that the coaches are wrong in how the game should be played now. The coaches today played in a different NHL and it required different skill sets and strategy to win. Of course I believe in "buying in" to a system, but what if the system could be radically different because of the personnel and the coaches just aren't harnessing that? The way Barzal holds onto the puck, and Ho-Sang to some extent, it has the potential to fundamentally change the structure of the team and the strategy. I don't like the idea of a guy like Barzal being forced to move the puck simply because he's circled the offensive zone three times. What if him holding it for that long is actually a good strategy? Moving it just to move it, to a lesser skilled layer, seems counter-productive sometimes.
That's just something I've been thinking about for a little bit, figured I'd throw it out there. When it comes down to it, I'm much more a structure and defense oriented hockey mind than I am high flying offensive systems, so I'm not necessarily advocating for a revolutionary approach...just posing the question.
I'd like to add that even if the way Ho-Sang and Barzal play is a better option, they don't get a free pass to ignore their coaches instructions. That's a no-go in my book.
I think it's totally fair to question this. I mean, Garth is a successless (that should be a word) GM and Weight is an inexperienced and successless coach, running a system with horrid PK, shots against, goals against, terrible W-L over the past 25-30 games and even worse when games matter.
I question all of this as well, including the style of play.
But not when it comes to JHS specifically simply because of the turnovers. It's a mistake driven league and whether you call it CORSI or Advanced Stats or Possession or "managing the puck" -- the amount of mistakes that lead to high-quality scoring changes against is astounding for this Isles team.
JHS is terrible in this aspect.
BUT so are many others, especially this year.
Ho-Sang, at least, can also balance the terrible defensive play with offensive ability and neutral zone speed, zone entries - but the truth is, existing players are almost as bad as H0-Sang with the mistakes/turnovers and bring ZERO offense (Quine, Prince, Fritz, Chimera, Clutterbuck has been awful this year, Tavares has been awful recently, Lee as well, Barzal's had a tough few weeks) - seems like they are ALL awful.
So you start to wonder whether it's the coaching/system or personnel.
It's probably a bit of everything.
The personnel on defense is also terrible. The mistakes and poor passes and slow skating (specifically poor decisions and lateral skating/defensive awareness) among Pelech, Pulock, Mayfield, Seidenberg are a thing of marvel. I think Hickey's been "good" (but if he's your second best defenseman or FIRST given Leddy's struggles this year) then what chance does your team have?
Boychuk, Leddy, Seidenberg, Hickey are all vets, they are what they are, won't get much better or worse (though Leddy's had a tough year basically on his own, Boychuk will never be and never was a puck-mover). Aho's young, has potential, but he's a #7 at best now.
The personnel is so bad that it's tough to blame the coach, but how can you trust a rookie coach who's never proven a THING at this level?
It's poor decisions at EVERY LEVEL in this organization. Impossible to adequately evaluate any of them, sadly. And it's GARTH who put them all there and who's in charge of evaluation (on-going) and FIXING (God help us all)