I'm guess not surprised you mischaracterized the question. And the answer. Here are exact quotes.
Munz " it always takes a little bit for guys to get back right up to games speed. Now that Mark's a couple games in now, do you feel your line will kinda get back to where you were before the injury?"
Wheeler "so you're implying we're not where we were before the injury"
Munz "I wouldn't say...." {Wheeler cut him off}
Wheeler "What did you think of the first period last game"
Munz "the first period was OK"
Wheeler "not bad eh. I'm not going to get into this with you Brian"
Blake did not accept what Munz presented to him as the basis for the question. If he answered it he would by default be agreeing with Munz that somehow it's Mark's fault. I liked the way he handled Munz.
It was my mistake for thinking he was referring to the team instead of the line. Change the word "line" to "team" and you will know what my concerns were. Completely my mistake and I apologize for you having to correct it.
But I will say that truly I'm not trying to mischaracterize the question on purpose.
I can be a **** at times but I'm not doing it on purpose. What I want is for this team to succeed. You also have to admit that when you say things that you have no problem that Chef and Wheels are joined at the hip, it would be cool to know why that is. Why is this holy matrimony of Chef + Wheels so great that anything goes?
Go!
