And against the devils.Absolutely. And Gardiner is rightfully roasted for his performance against the Hawks.
Unbelievably bad game by Gards. He was really, REALLY terrible. Just "meh" in the 3rd, but a non-stop parade of brutal mistakes in the first 2 periods. Don't ever want to see him play like that again.
I've never been a big fan of his game but crap happens, good players have bad games. Sometimes in stretches.
Maybe play Hainsey with him for a few games, for whatever reason the chemistry Zaitsev and Gards had at the end of the season is not there so far this year.
I've been saying for the last 3 games, now four, this team has a lot of work to do if they want to be contenders. The detail in their game is no where near where they need it to be to be considered one of the better teams in the league.
Biggest issue right now is how do we allow Andersen see the puck, far too many screen and tip goals this year.
It's early though, most teams aren't really firing on all cylinders yet a game like last night, Babcock will be able to get their attention now about detail.
Bolded-That to me is that many of our wingers are late to the point and not getting into the shooting lanes. Waaaay too easy for opposing D to get pucks through right now.
We are rambunctious, sloppy kids trying to out skate all our problems and prove to world we are faster and better and can just bury teams on that alone. The reality is the vets are just starting to stir, stretching and waking up. When they are awake they will bury us on our sloppy unhinged play. Order, structure, discipline must be now pounded in their heads.
Coaches message... Well I am glad to see your limbs are awake, now let's go to work on your heads before you start blowing your bodies out. Fire wheel is fun though ain't it.
That is two in a row.. he had been just ok in the other two.Unbelievably bad game by Gards. He was really, REALLY terrible. Just "meh" in the 3rd, but a non-stop parade of brutal mistakes in the first 2 periods. Don't ever want to see him play like that again.
LOL, as you know, hard for a coach to get their attention when they win, a little easier after a loss. Young team, sometimes we will need to lose to get better.
How the heck was that Borgman's man? Rielly was right beside him and left him. At least if you tried to argue that Marner should have rotated I could sort of buy that, but Bratt was Borgman's man on that play. Stop with the contrived excuses.
I don't see anyone here (especially myself) making up excuses for Gardiner s puck watching and failure to hold the line on that play, though one could stretch it to blame Nylander if they really squinted. The double standards are real.
Ideally, Rielly would not pressure his guy down low there in that situation. Just cut off the passing option. If not, you wish Borgman had played that situation more carefully, allowing them time behind the net to not open up lanes in front. If not, you'd want our forwards to collapse down.But if you had to choose one person, I'm not sure it would be Rielly.
The play happened very quickly.
Devils had two forwards beneath the goal line: Johansson to Andersen's right (where Rielly is) and Bratt to Andersen's left (where Borgman is).
How it played out:
- Bratt holds the line and skates into the corner, feeds the puck to Johansson behind the net. Zacha is positioned in front.
- Rielly applies pressure on Johansson, Johansson feeds it back to Bratt. Rielly's now at the goal line.
- Borgman reacts to pass behind the net, moves towards Bratt, abandoning Zacha in front of the goal.
- Bratt one-times a pass past Borgman (through his skates, perhaps?) to Zacha, who pots the goal.
It was really a masterful passing play, it's hard to attribute fault to something like that. Two passes and a shot on goal in less than a second. But if you had to choose one person, I'm not sure it would be Rielly.
It only looked like a masterful passing play because half the PK unit was below the icing line chasing pucks they couldn't get. Rielly getting lured into that is inexplicable.
Please, that wasn't Marner's responsibility at all. Either you are biased against Mitch or you know jack squat, take your pick. Jeez. BOTH D abandoned the front of the net, that NEVER should happen, they mixed up their coverage, PERIOD. Man this place...Jake Thread but if Rielly covered the man closest to Mitch the guy down low had free reign to just come out from behind and do whatever. Someone had to take that man and only Marner was in position. Marner decided to try and cover the guy at the point for some reason.
I absolve Rielly of all wrong doing.
Please, that wasn't Marner's responsibility at all. Either you are biased against Mitch or you know jack squat, take your pick. Jeez. BOTH D abandoned the front of the net, that NEVER should happen, they mixed up their coverage, PERIOD. Man this place...
Wow, one bad game and here we go....Gardiner always had warts and always will, did people actually think he was a different player now? You have to take Jake in totality, and it's a net positive from where I sit. Nothing has changed.
That is true, but if it does happen, forwards need to collapse. Not just hold their position and allow a free space in front of the net while covering the points.BOTH D abandoned the front of the net, that NEVER should happen
So why was Mitch not behind the net then, who blew the coverage? I cant see all the play from the video and memory. What was the guy on the point going to do? Take a 1000ft shot? Mitch obviously didn't read what was going on properly. You could even see the hesitation and reverse in direction when he saw the mistake.