LouJersey
Registered User
It's amazing how opinions on players can change after seeing them play instead of just reading stat sheets.
You made me a huge fan in like January/Feb of his draft year. You were all over it!
It's amazing how opinions on players can change after seeing them play instead of just reading stat sheets.
I had Vancouver in 5 in 2011 and may have if Adam Rome didn't lay out Nathan Horton
I am an advocate of Sweeney drafting but I was hoping Carlo & McAvoy would be playing this well in Providence
I would still take Barzal over DeBrusk in a heartbeat but my argument against the picks was against Senyshyn.... if you feel that you have so many 1st round picks that you can make a swing-for-the-fences gamble on a high-end talent, then why not go for the one that fell into your lap rather than reaching deep into the 2nd?
I'd take Barzal over DeBrusk BUT would take DeBrusk over Senyshyn so we would have ended up with both (and they would have complimented each other very well too).
Wanting Barzal had/has more to do with Barzal having a higher offensive ceiling than DeBrusk who has a safer floor. DeBrusk has impressed me at times and his skating has really improved. Neither of his parents are thin people, so there should be a chance to pack 15pds on over the next few years which is really needed in his style of game.
On a side note: DeBrusk is 7 months older than Barzal --not insignificant when comparing guys from the same draft "year". It also allowed DeBrusk an extra year (in preparing for this year) to go play pro while Barzal was too young for the AHL and had to spin his tires for another year in the WHL just toying with the competition when he would have been way better off playing against men.
I've said this since day 1 and completely agree. Zboril was a need and appropriately ranked, liked that pick a lot when it happened. Debrusk seemed like a very high floor guy who could step into the lineup pretty soon..didn't love the pick but you have to think his character/grit/high loor/ability to at LEAST provide secondary scoring was attractive to them. Senyshyn was a swing for the fences pick IMO. Has the skillset to be a legitimate top 6 goal scorer or completely bust.
You're argument is just as poor to be honest. Small sample sizes all around.
I fully expected me to be more excited about Bjork than DeBrusk and though Bjork would be the better player at the start of the season. DeBrusk has been pleasantly surprising me. The kid should have a nice career in the NHL if he keeps progressing.
I would still take Barzal over DeBrusk in a heartbeat but my argument against the picks was against Senyshyn.... if you feel that you have so many 1st round picks that you can make a swing-for-the-fences gamble on a high-end talent, then why not go for the one that fell into your lap rather than reaching deep into the 2nd?
I'd take Barzal over DeBrusk BUT would take DeBrusk over Senyshyn so we would have ended up with both (and they would have complimented each other very well too).
Wanting Barzal had/has more to do with Barzal having a higher offensive ceiling than DeBrusk who has a safer floor. DeBrusk has impressed me at times and his skating has really improved. Neither of his parents are thin people, so there should be a chance to pack 15pds on over the next few years which is really needed in his style of game.
On a side note: DeBrusk is 7 months older than Barzal --not insignificant when comparing guys from the same draft "year". It also allowed DeBrusk an extra year (in preparing for this year) to go play pro while Barzal was too young for the AHL and had to spin his tires for another year in the WHL just toying with the competition when he would have been way better off playing against men.
The kid has some wheels doesn't he.
Let's hopeHe reminded me of Seguin yesterday, how he looks and breaking through multiple defenders.
Heinen to me looks complete and polished. DeBrusk looks like a I am going go through you and the wall type of guy and Bjork is all skill like Pasta but maybe just maybe better long term. One thing for sure is they can all score and play the game the right way. Gotta give the scouting some props on this. All this Barzal talk is because the kid is playing well, if he was tanking it would be quite. The main board has blown up again about it because one of our own started a thread about it, yeah nice work, great job - friendly fire. I like to add Cehlarik in the talks too as he is just as polished and game ready. I would not mind seeing Bjork go to the AHL for some seasoning, it would be good for him.who do you guys think will be better between Heinen, Debrusk, Bjork??
Hopefully equals! Good mix right there!who do you guys think will be better between Heinen, Debrusk, Bjork??
Excellent comparison! Faster Nash.I find the way looks when he skates and handles the puck, reminds me of a smaller Rick Nash.
i agree that the bruins should have taken Barzal over Seny
But I'm glad the Bruins chose Debrusk.
Faster Nash? He was scary fast in his 20's, especially for a big man.Excellent comparison! Faster Nash.
Baffles me why people from here go to the main board to get burned. Nothing good will come of it. It's like Twitter.Heinen to me looks complete and polished. DeBrusk looks like a I am going go through you and the wall type of guy and Bjork is all skill like Pasta but maybe just maybe better long term. One thing for sure is they can all score and play the game the right way. Gotta give the scouting some props on this. All this Barzal talk is because the kid is playing well, if he was tanking it would be quite. The main board has blown up again about it because one of our own started a thread about it, yeah nice work, great job - friendly fire. I like to add Cehlarik in the talks too as he is just as polished and game ready. I would not mind seeing Bjork go to the AHL for some seasoning, it would be good for him.