august said:Can someone give me a scouting reports on these two player?
Thanks
MaDdY said:Skille has the better overall skill IMO. Stoa is good, and has size going for him. I take Stoa because of his size, and he's not bad in the skill department either.
MaDdY said:When i saw Skille, he seemes more glued to the stick and was checking throughout. However, he's 6'1...Stoa on the other hand is 6'3 i think, and isnt as physical as Skille. My point isnt that strong but i would say lots of teams will take Stoa ahead of him only because of size...dont you think ?
Frenzy1 said:I agree that Skille is more physical. He also seems more built. Stoa looks tall and slender. But I like Stoa's stick abilities more then Skille. Kind of like comparing Keith Tkachuck to Pav. Demitra (size taken out of equation). Stoa, like Demitra, is better with the puck on his stick a lot slicker player - and Demitra does go to high traffic areas, Skille is like Tk in that he is physical, can carry the puck but not flashy with it. Makes his living in front of the net and has good hands.
I think Skille may be taken 1st due to his style of play. Plus the hype from one Tournament. But if both players are on the board when St. Louis picks, I would rather have Stoa.
Mueller is another player that could be 1st round material. I think a lot will depend, for these 3, on how the U18 WJC goes. They can help or hurt there cause.
markov` said:Mueller is only available for 2006 and he will probably go top 5.
But thanks for the reports on both Skille and Stoa. They're both, with Jack Johnson, the best eligible prospects I've not seen this year.
cagney said:
The Great One said:Thx , alot.Wow , Skille seems to be very CLUTCH! 5 GW ! I've only seen Skille play once and he's really impressive physically , I think Skille is exactly what the habs need for right now.I also like Stoa , in the majority of the scouting reports on him , it's written that he's a good goalscorer.I've seen him play and his playmaking skills are really underrated , he can make some impressive accurate passes.On the pp , he's very dangerous.Stoa is a good all around play (he wasn't that bad defensively from the game I seen) but so is SKille.Stoa is bigger but I've not seen him use his size so often.
I think he uses his size well, really able to shield the puck. But he isn't as physical.
Frenzy1 said:I think he uses his size well, really able to shield the puck. But he isn't as physical.
Primetime955 said:Skille isnt as physical as Stoa? How many games have you seen, 1? Stoa is 6'3 and hasnt touched anyone this year.
Frenzy1 said:I think he uses his size well, really able to shield the puck. But he isn't as physical.