Lame Lambert
Fire Lou
- Mar 5, 2015
- 21,219
- 15,634
I mean I get it by Weight though. While I would like some changes in the lines the team won last night and I have a feeling he switches the lineup against the Rangers on Thursday regardless of what happens tonight.
I don't care if they won 20-0 last night. The powerplay is 0-18 and you have 2 skilled players sitting in the press box so Jason ****ing Chimera can play.
Beauvillier played his best hockey at the end of the year.I understand, I would love to see Pulock play but I understand why the move was made. Beauvillier should not have been sat for Chimera in the first place, but these west coast swings are not the norm for the team either. These teams are much bigger than the Islanders and I think Weight is trying to play a bit of a bigger lineup against them.
I want to see Pulock and Beauvillier play but how about we just let them run this lineup against LA tonight and see what happens?
People forget how quickly some of the younger guys have worn down throughout the season (see Beauvillier last year), I have no problem with them sitting a game here and then to attempt to not wear them down.
Beauvillier played his best hockey at the end of the year.
If Beau was struggling i could understand but he has been playing well.It doesn't mean that he did not wear down in months like January. I mean if I need to look the stats up I will, but it's not exactly like he had a banner year last year. He played like a third liner for the majority of the year. Nothing to write home about.
I mean you see it every year with Nelson, you saw it with Strome in his rookie year, saw it with Lee the year we played the Caps, and the examples go on and on and on and on. If you don't think Beauvillier will wear down at all this year when you play him every single game then you are out to lunch. Go ahead and play him 82 games and watch what happens.
Last night’s lineup was lucky to win. The only way Weight changes the lineup against the Rags is if we lose tonight or someone gets injured.I mean I get it by Weight though. While I would like some changes in the lines the team won last night and I have a feeling he switches the lineup against the Rangers on Thursday regardless of what happens tonight.
It doesn't mean that he did not wear down in months like January. I mean if I need to look the stats up I will, but it's not exactly like he had a banner year last year. He played like a third liner for the majority of the year. Nothing to write home about.
I mean you see it every year with Nelson, you saw it with Strome in his rookie year, saw it with Lee the year we played the Caps, and the examples go on and on and on and on. If you don't think Beauvillier will wear down at all this year when you play him every single game then you are out to lunch. Go ahead and play him 82 games and watch what happens.
Fixed it for you.I don't care if they won 20-0 last night. The powerplay is 0-18 and you have 2 skilled players sitting in the press box so Jason ****ing Chimera and Nikolay f***ing Kulemin can play.
All this after Weight made a point of saying during training camp that players who are producing will play whether they’re rookies of vets.I'm just curious why you are using "wearing down through the year" as an excuse for sitting him in back-to-back games in mid-October? Wouldn't it make more sense to sit him in January, when the season starts to wear on him? There's no logic in your argument.
Weight is favoring the vets and traditional pecking order, that's all he's really doing. His lineups are not based on merit. If they were, guys like Chimera and de Haan who have played like dog **** would be sitting.
Proof is in the pudding. Can't bench Ho Sang as he's producing. Barzal is playing well creating chances but if he does not produce any points he will be the next to sit not a veteran who doesn't produce points or create chances.All this after Weight made a point of saying during training camp that players who are producing will play whether they’re rookies of vets.
But you can bench Kulemin and you can bench Chimera. What have they done to warrant getting more ice time at the expense of Beauvillier?Proof is in the pudding. Can't bench Ho Sang as he's producing. Barzal is playing well creating chances but if he does not produce any points he will be the next to sit not a veteran who doesn't produce points or create chances.
I'm just curious why you are using "wearing down through the year" as an excuse for sitting him in back-to-back games in mid-October? Wouldn't it make more sense to sit him in January, when the season starts to wear on him? There's no logic in your argument.
Weight is favoring the vets and traditional pecking order, that's all he's really doing. His lineups are not based on merit. If they were, guys like Chimera and de Haan who have played like dog **** would be sitting.
If Beau was struggling i could understand but he has been playing well.
Last night’s lineup was lucky to win. The only way Weight changes the lineup against the Rags is if we lose tonight or someone gets injured.
So I ask, why keep scratching young players who could create offense on a team that has no power play goals and has a negative goal differential?
I would love to see Beau with Barzal. Beau from what I've seen has the best slapper on the team. Combination worked well when they played for team Canada a couple of years ago. I don't mind the rotating but Weight seems to favor the vets over younger players just like cappy did. He already benched Ho sang and will again as soon as he has a bad game.I'm using it as an excuse because what is the point of sitting the guy in January when he is already worn down? That is like saying sit Halak for a few games in March because you played him too much in November. The damage is already done at that point.
He has been playing well, the Isles also have looked overmatched early on in the season against some bigger teams.
I like Beauvillier a lot, but to say he creates more offense than Chimera is laughable at best. The guy had 24 points last year, while Chimera had 20 goals. He also has one point so far this year, is that really what you call a guy who can "create offense"?
I don't want to side with the guy who is sitting Beau but you guys are making it easy. Beauvillier is small, young, and not experienced... So let's play him 82 games a year!
I would love to see Beau with Barzal. Beau from what I've seen has the best slapper on the team. Combination worked well when they played for team Canada a couple of years ago. I don't mind the rotating but Weight seems to favor the vets over younger players just like cappy did. He already benched Ho sang and will again as soon as he has a bad game.
Yeah, that makes absolutely zero sense. Players are usually given a rest towards the end of the year as the season starts to wear on them, not at the beginning when they are still fresh.I'm using it as an excuse because what is the point of sitting the guy in January when he is already worn down? That is like saying sit Halak for a few games in March because you played him too much in November. The damage is already done at that point.
Nah we can just have Bailey sit at the point and have everyone else look like a 95 year old trying to use an iPhone for the first time.Makes no sense to scratch Beau for the 2nd straight game.
And with the PP struggling to score, you need to have someone from the point like Pulock.