Islanders Sign Ryan O'Marra

BelovedIsles

Registered User
Oct 22, 2005
20,216
5,463
ReLyT said:

Not one but two goals in his debut for Bridge last night versus the Phantoms. Idk if its too early, but thats a good indication. Bring on Comeau and boy o boy Bridge will be STACKED for the playoffs--Nilsson, Bergenheim, Nokie, Gervais, Grebs, Tambs, Colliton, O'Marra, Comeau, Bouchard (tho not a prospect). Chemistry issues would be my only concern...
 

NYIsles1*

Guest
O'Marra opens scoring for Bridgeport Saturday with his third goal. :handclap:

 

boredmale

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 13, 2005
42,437
7,009
I wonder if the Islanders will bring him up to play a few games. With us out of the playoff race, they might do it to try create a lil buzz and sell a couple tickets.

Whatever happens hopefully O'Marracan play in the playoffs for the Bridgeport Soundtigers.
 

Hunter Gathers

The Crown
Feb 27, 2002
106,656
11,788
parts unknown
Kvashinator12 said:
just giving you a hard time jonny boy....you know you're one of my favorite posters here, except that you are a rags fan.

S'all good! ;)

I always mention you when I have to mention the more level-headed Isles posters, so the feeling is mutual!
 

boredmale

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 13, 2005
42,437
7,009
Hawkhead said:
Mike Blunden >>> O'Marra

O'Marra is promising and may/will be a good player but his later round teamate is rock solid :bow:

Give me the sure thing anyday. Blunden might turn out to be a great goal scorer but he can turn out to be nothing. O'Marra on the other hand has the downside potential of being a decent 3rd line center. While Blunden had good statistics this year i wouldn't say they are great.
 

Seph

Registered User
Sep 5, 2002
18,949
1,666
Oregon
Visit site
boredmale said:
Give me the sure thing anyday. Blunden might turn out to be a great goal scorer but he can turn out to be nothing. O'Marra on the other hand has the downside potential of being a decent 3rd line center. While Blunden had good statistics this year i wouldn't say they are great.
To be fair, Blunden's pretty safe too. He's got great size, and clearly has pretty good offensive upside. I don't know if his defensive game is as well developed, but I'd be pretty surprised if he wasn't an NHLer. I would've absolutely loved it if he had last a few more picks so we could've nabbed him the second and had both of them. That said, I do think O'Marra's downsidei is higher than Blunden's, but I think both should be pretty solid players.
 

MentalPowerHouse

Registered User
Oct 11, 2003
580
0
Korpido said:
He's got Captain written all over him.

I don't see him being anything more than a third line center though.

I dunno how you can really say that. Its clear he is no offensive dynamo but if he works hard he could become a 2nd line center and chip in some points.
 

Korpido

Registered User
Jul 15, 2005
218
0
MentalPowerHouse said:
I dunno how you can really say that. Its clear he is no offensive dynamo but if he works hard he could become a 2nd line center and chip in some points.


His top end potential is a 2nd line center, i just dont think he'll reach it...


and for a 2 way player, he was a -14 in 8 games! thats pretty un spectacular
 

Hunter Gathers

The Crown
Feb 27, 2002
106,656
11,788
parts unknown
MentalPowerHouse said:
I dunno how you can really say that. Its clear he is no offensive dynamo but if he works hard he could become a 2nd line center and chip in some points.

I think he'll top out as a middle of the road 2nd liner. He's got skills, no doubt, but the upside just isn't there to be much higher. Seems like a nice kid / class act type of player, too.
 

Hunter Gathers

The Crown
Feb 27, 2002
106,656
11,788
parts unknown
Korpido said:
His top end potential is a 2nd line center, i just dont think he'll reach it...


and for a 2 way player, he was a -14 in 8 games! thats pretty un spectacular

Yeah, but you have to remember it's his first ever pro games... It's a WEE bit different from playing against kids all around your own age. There's definately an adjustment curve and some people have it built into them where they can just play solid at every level. He might be one of the more normal guys who just needs a bit of time to get used to the better overall play. If I was an Islander fan, I wouldn't be worried about that at all. He's still young as can be.
 

Transported Upstater

Guest
Jon Prescription said:
Yeah, but you have to remember it's his first ever pro games... It's a WEE bit, eh! different from playing against kids all around your own age. There's definately an adjustment curve and some people have it built into them where they can just play solid at every level. He might be one of the more normal guys who just needs a bit of time to get used to the better overall play. If I was an Islander fan, I wouldn't be worried about that at all. He's still young as can be.



Jon Prescription: CANADIAN EDITION!!!!!
 

Seph

Registered User
Sep 5, 2002
18,949
1,666
Oregon
Visit site
Jon Prescription said:
Yeah, but you have to remember it's his first ever pro games... It's a WEE bit different from playing against kids all around your own age. There's definately an adjustment curve and some people have it built into them where they can just play solid at every level. He might be one of the more normal guys who just needs a bit of time to get used to the better overall play. If I was an Islander fan, I wouldn't be worried about that at all. He's still young as can be.
He's also playing on a team missing a lot of regulars to injury and call up. Looking at the lineup from the last game they played, they went with 7 Dmen, 3 of which were in the ECHL until the injuries struck, 1 was a 19yo 2005 draft pick in his first AHL game, and the other three are career AHLers with more or less zero chance of ever making the NHL. On top of that, the team only had 8 forwards dresssed, 3 of whom were ECHLers, 1 was a 20yo undrafted juniors guy getting his first taste of pro hockey, a rookie, and two career AHLers.

Kind of hard to judge a guy's defense based on his +/- in a situation like that. Bridgeport at the moment looks like an ECHL team, and not even a full one at that. I suspect he's drawing the top checking assignments as well, because looking at that roster, he's probably the best checking center on the team (not much of an accomplishment, admittedly). And when you're playing in front of a defense that wouldn't stand out in the ECHL against other team's top lines, I don't care how good defensively you are, it's going to be a struggle to have a good +/-. Might as well be knocking Brian Willsie's -21.

Anyway, at the moment, his +/-, while not particularly exciting, doesn't concern me. When he's had more time to adjust and the team is better, then I think it might be worth looking at. But right now, I suspect it's horribly skewed.
 

KH1

Registered User
Korpido said:
His top end potential is a 2nd line center, i just dont think he'll reach it...


and for a 2 way player, he was a -14 in 8 games! thats pretty un spectacular

Like Seph said, players who might normally be in Bridgeport (Colliton, Bergenheim, Regier, Nilsson, Tambellini, Gervais, Grebeshkov, Caldwell and maybe a few others) are closing out the season on Long Island.

+/- is a useless stat for that reason. In any case I'd take 5 points in his first 8 professional games on a severely overmatched team any day from O'Marra.
 

Levitate

Registered User
Jul 29, 2004
31,030
7,795
Kvashinator12 said:
rather him at 15 than Hugh Jessiman at 9

Jessiman was drafted at 12. Yeah not that much better (though there's plenty of time for him to work things out), but if the Rangers had the 9 spot they would have taken Phaneuf, not Jessiman.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad