I dunno, give Kane a top player like Panarin and he's Hart-caliber. That's one notch clearly above Kucherov.
Weird thing to say considering Kucherov had a better PPG and significantly more goals than Kane last year - while Panarin was on the Hawks and Stamkos missed the majority of the season.
People just didn't realize how good Kucherov was last year and still don't which is a big issue. To be honest there's not much of a difference between last years Kucherov and this years Kucherov IMO. But Stamkos has been healthy all year, the Bolts have been on top of the league instead of scratching and clawing trying to make the playoffs and Kuch played 6 more games - all factor in making the jump from 85 pts to 100 pts.
As per usual people need to see flashy numbers before they realize how good someone is.
Fact is Kane was better 3 years ago. There's been 2 seasons in between now. That should be enough of a sample size to draw conclusion for "the now".
I still think Kane is an elite winger for sure, and the difference between elite wingers in the game is minimal - anyone could have the best season. But there's not much more Kucherov could've done the past couple years not to win this comparison as of now, there has to be bias for anyone saying Kane is the better player.