IIHF announces plans for Worlds and Olympics

Discussion in 'International Tournaments' started by Art Vandelay, May 14, 2006.

  1. Art Vandelay

    Art Vandelay Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2004
    Messages:
    5,597
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    College Student
    Location:
    Stockholm
    Home Page:
    The most interesting part is No.3 about the Olympics.

     
  2. johnny_rudeboy

    johnny_rudeboy Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2006
    Messages:
    24,464
    Likes Received:
    1,069
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Karlstad
    Hmmm, sounds interesting. Most players will probably play in the NHL anyway but the players out side the top 6/7 nations might have some problems. Is there any country in Europe who have the smaller rinks?
    Anyway, good thing they will play at the best arena aviable.
     
  3. ALF AmericanLionsFan

    ALF AmericanLionsFan Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    7,602
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    141
    Occupation:
    teacher
    Location:
    Cleveland, Ohio USA
    Home Page:
    Hmm that is kind of interesting. I like watching the bigger sheet in the Olympics myself. Just kind of a break from the game we are seeing on a daily basis.
     
  4. Slitty

    Slitty Registered User

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    Messages:
    3,862
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    96
    I don't like this break from tradition, especially with all the recent calls for the NHL to switch to bigger ice.
     
  5. Tricolore#20

    Tricolore#20 PK PK PK

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2003
    Messages:
    8,255
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    94
    Location:
    Toronto
    Home Page:
    That's strange, considering that at the time of the bid being awarded to Vancouver, VANOC claimed that GM Place could be converted to an Olympic sized rink. I guess they realized that was a dream that couldn't be fulfilled.
     
  6. Reaper45

    Reaper45 Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2003
    Messages:
    33,436
    Likes Received:
    682
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    I prefer the small rink myself. We'll get to see a lot more physical hockey.
     
  7. RorschachWJK

    RorschachWJK Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2004
    Messages:
    3,739
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    96
    Occupation:
    Researcher, freshw. ecol.
    Location:
    Kuusamo
    Not a good idea. Olympic rinks should stay as they are. Home ice should be a big enough advantage for Canada, no need for this kind of trickery.
     
  8. MeatTornado

    MeatTornado I was born ready

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2004
    Messages:
    2,525
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Vancouver
    Trickery? It said that all the teams agreed to it. If they hadn't all agreed on it, I'm sure they would have done something else.
     
  9. N Bahn Ahden

    N Bahn Ahden Registered User

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2003
    Messages:
    6,302
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Home Page:
    Trickery or not, this plays into the strength of Canada. Wasn't the rink in Salt Lake also NHL size?
     
  10. Vikke

    Vikke ViktorAllvin twitter

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    15,144
    Likes Received:
    293
    Trophy Points:
    154
    Location:
    Vimmerby, Sweden
    Home Page:
    I'm not sure, but I seem to recall that Finland has smaller rinks than Sweden?
     
  11. Bank Shot

    Bank Shot Registered User

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    6,965
    Likes Received:
    350
    Trophy Points:
    124
    And Finland. And USA. And Switzerland.
     
  12. Jazz

    Jazz Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2004
    Messages:
    3,446
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Vancouver, Canada
    Home Page:
    No, it was not, it was the standard Olympic size.
     
  13. Jazz

    Jazz Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2004
    Messages:
    3,446
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Vancouver, Canada
    Home Page:
    BTW - do you have an updated link - the one posted now points elsewhere.
     
  14. TORRUS

    TORRUS Registered User

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Messages:
    1,270
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Beli
    I don't know where it is now but this is what it was about:

    1. The teams agreed on the Olympic format of 12 teams (like this year)

    2. The rankings after the 2008 WCH (Canada) will determine the top 8 countries who will directly qualify for the Olympic tournament. The reamaining 4 spots will be known in february 2009 after the pre-Olympic tournament ends.

    3. Due to the long distances between cities in 2007 (Russia-St. Petersburgh, Moscow) and 2008 (Canada-don't know the two cities Halifax?) the quarterfinals will be played under the new system. There won't be crossing groups like it was 'til now (1F-4E, 1E-4F). The quaretrfinals will be played within the groups (1E-4E, 2E-3E) so that teams don't have to travel before the semifinals.

    That's it.

    I guess it's easier not to cross groups when the distances are so big and that's OK, but it won't be as interesting. But it's only for the next 2 WCHs. Where is the championship in 2009?
     
  15. ES

    ES Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2004
    Messages:
    3,105
    Likes Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Location:
    Finland
    Switzerland. 2010 in Germany.
     
  16. shelley1142

    shelley1142 Fire Howson!

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2006
    Messages:
    587
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Sarasota, Fl
    and Sweden and Russia(if they can make everything right with their NHL players by then)
     
  17. Rabid Ranger

    Rabid Ranger 2 is better than one

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2002
    Messages:
    22,620
    Likes Received:
    465
    Trophy Points:
    199
    Occupation:
    Contract manager
    Location:
    Murica
    This is a non-issue as far as I'm concerned. The best team will win regardless of the size of the ice surface.
     
  18. KRM

    KRM Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2005
    Messages:
    11,195
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    126
    Location:
    Gothenburg
    Too bad, I like the Coliseum.
     
  19. Exactly.

    I personally think the big-ice vs. small-ice argument is one of the most over-rated and over-hyped myths of hockey.

    It is merely an excuse that European countries have used for years to explain why Canada has won so many tournaments in the past.
     
  20. Ola

    Ola Registered User Sponsor

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    Messages:
    25,190
    Likes Received:
    1,729
    Trophy Points:
    196
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Lawyer
    Location:
    Sweden
    As a Swede I think we are having a big advantage everytime we play Canada in the WCH, on small ice, Canada don't have as big advantage as we do on big ice because our players have more small ice experience, but often we in Sweden for example have 2-3 "depth players" who aren't as good on small ice.
     
  21. Ola

    Ola Registered User Sponsor

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    Messages:
    25,190
    Likes Received:
    1,729
    Trophy Points:
    196
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Lawyer
    Location:
    Sweden
    I think its great not to cross groups. For example this time Czech, Canada, US and the Finns would know that they are gooing to meat each other in the QF when they play the first game. Would defenitly turn up the atomsphere a notch.
     
  22. Jazz

    Jazz Registered User

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2004
    Messages:
    3,446
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Vancouver, Canada
    Home Page:
    What about the QF winners?

    Will it be E1/E4 vs E2/E3
    or
    E1/E4 vs F2/F3?

    PS. Torrus, long time no see....
     
  23. TORRUS

    TORRUS Registered User

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Messages:
    1,270
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Beli
    I think they will cross for the SF; so E1-E4 vs. F2-F3. They mentioned only the QF being from the same group.

    My apologies Jazz, will be back soon. :)
     
  24. JussiM

    JussiM Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2006
    Messages:
    724
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    74
    Location:
    Finland
    From the next year on there won't be ties anymore and a win gives you three points. That's what I heard in the radio today.
     
  25. CaptBrannigan

    CaptBrannigan Registered User

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2006
    Messages:
    3,255
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Location:
    Tampa
    No ties? I'd think that implies a shootout, there's no way they'd do continuous OT for a first round game.
     

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"