If a player(foreign or not) is already under contract with an organization and if there is a strike and that player decides to cross the line to play. How can he be considered a replacement player, isn't he a current player? He is already on the organization's roster. Couldn't you have a team filled half of replacement players and players that were currently on the teams roster? To me it would seem a player under contract is a current player and not a replacement. Eventhough, he is rejecting the PA's strike. How do the courts make that distinction?