A Good Flying Bird*
Guest
Four options here.
I vote for reducing the rollback and increasing the luxury tax, substantially.
I vote for reducing the rollback and increasing the luxury tax, substantially.
no13matssundin said:You missed the option that will happen:
Lock out end next year as owners implement hard cap and introduce replacement players.
no13matssundin said:You missed the option that will happen:
Lock out end next year as owners implement hard cap and introduce replacement players.
Me too. But if the owners' rhetoric to date is to be believed, that won't be enough.Newsguyone said:Four options here.
I vote for reducing the rollback and increasing the luxury tax, substantially.
FLYLine4LIFE said:You should have put on the poll...Keep the Rollback and add a stiffer luxary tax.
FLYLine4LIFE said:For the 100th time and the 100th person to tell you...THE NHL WILL NEVER INTRODUCE REPLACEMENT PLAYERS! ITS A BLUFF. IF they do the NHL will LOOSE SO MUCH MONEY it wont even be funny.
Newsguyone said:Isn't that #3?
no13matssundin said:FlyLine, im saving this post so I can re-post it for you when it happens. Cool?
FLYLine4LIFE said:You should have put on the poll...Keep the Rollback and add a stiffer luxary tax.
Right on, this is what will happen...Kodiak said:Very doubtful that will happen. If the owners accept the idea of a luxury tax but want it much stiffer, then the players are probably going to use the rollback as a bargaining chip. "Okay, we can accept the harsher tax, but only if the salary rollback drops to 15%."