How do you think this needs to be resolved?

[A Good Flying Bird*]

Four options here.

I vote for reducing the rollback and increasing the luxury tax, substantially.

Click to read more...

 

[no13matssundin]

You missed the option that will happen:

Lock out end next year as owners implement hard cap and introduce replacement players.

 

[A Good Flying Bird*]

You missed the option that will happen:

Lock out end next year as owners implement hard cap and introduce replacement players.

Well, let's just talk about the hope for this season with regard to this poll

 

[FLYLine27*]

You missed the option that will happen:

Lock out end next year as owners implement hard cap and introduce replacement players.

For the 100th time and the 100th person to tell you...THE NHL WILL NEVER INTRODUCE REPLACEMENT PLAYERS! ITS A BLUFF. IF they do the NHL will LOOSE SO MUCH MONEY it wont even be funny.

 

[FLYLine27*]

You should have put on the poll...Keep the Rollback and add a stiffer luxary tax.

 

[Blind Gardien]

Four options here.

I vote for reducing the rollback and increasing the luxury tax, substantially.

Me too. But if the owners' rhetoric to date is to be believed, that won't be enough.

 

[A Good Flying Bird*]

You should have put on the poll...Keep the Rollback and add a stiffer luxary tax.

Isn't that #3?

 

[no13matssundin]

For the 100th time and the 100th person to tell you...THE NHL WILL NEVER INTRODUCE REPLACEMENT PLAYERS! ITS A BLUFF. IF they do the NHL will LOOSE SO MUCH MONEY it wont even be funny.

FlyLine, im saving this post so I can re-post it for you when it happens. Cool?

 

[FLYLine27*]

Isn't that #3?

#3 is Keep the roll back, and a much, much stiffer rollback. But looking at it now he probably meant to say stiffer Luxary Tax

 

[FLYLine27*]

FlyLine, im saving this post so I can re-post it for you when it happens. Cool?

Please do.

 

[Kodiak]

You should have put on the poll...Keep the Rollback and add a stiffer luxary tax.

Very doubtful that will happen. If the owners accept the idea of a luxury tax but want it much stiffer, then the players are probably going to use the rollback as a bargaining chip. "Okay, we can accept the harsher tax, but only if the salary rollback drops to 15%."

 

[BLONG7]

Very doubtful that will happen. If the owners accept the idea of a luxury tax but want it much stiffer, then the players are probably going to use the rollback as a bargaining chip. "Okay, we can accept the harsher tax, but only if the salary rollback drops to 15%."

Right on, this is what will happen...