How are the Oilers this bad with mcdavid?

syz

[1, 5, 6, 14]
Jul 13, 2007
29,239
12,857
Starting to think that the Oilers will never be good until they start getting some production out of 2nd+ round picks. That's pretty much the only constant over the last 10'ish years.
 

Beerfish

Registered User
Apr 14, 2007
19,513
5,665
The vast majority of the blame falls squarely on the worst owner in the league, katz.

All sorts of people get blamed over the years for the oilers but the guy that skates free all the time is the owner.
 

Sempiternal

Registered User
Jul 5, 2014
3,460
1,944
Oilers continuously let in the 1st shot on goal this season. Weak goaltending and poor preparation, makes them play catch-up most games.
 

CupofOil

Knob Flavored Coffey
Aug 20, 2009
46,684
40,375
NYC
Well Oilers fans told us all off season that would be the case.

Everybody in the entire hockey universe thought the Oilers would be good this season and most had them on the short list of Cup contenders as hard as that is to believe. If anything, Oiler fans were more skeptical than everybody else because of Chia's general inactivity in the offseason outside of the Eberle trade.
I'd like to see all these geniuses who picked the Oilers to miss the playoffs, did anybody?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dukeofjive
Oct 18, 2011
44,090
9,719
Everybody in the entire hockey universe thought the Oilers would be good this season and most had them on the short list of Cup contenders as hard as that is to believe. If anything, Oiler fans were more skeptical than everybody else because of Chia's general inactivity in the offseason outside of the Eberle trade.
I'd like to see all these geniuses who picked the Oilers to miss the playoffs, did anybody?
they were never a cup contender, they were a clear regression candidate people overreacted to last season
 
  • Like
Reactions: PunkRockLocke

CupofOil

Knob Flavored Coffey
Aug 20, 2009
46,684
40,375
NYC
they were never a cup contender, they were a clear regression candidate people overreacted to last season

What was your prediction prior to the season? I highly doubt you were one of the 2 or 3 people out of thousands to pick them to miss the playoffs and if you were, kudos to you for going out on a limb.

I actually warned in the offseason that there might be some regression. Too much went right last season all at once, some career years, picture perfect health and it's sometimes tough for young teams to deal with their first taste of success following a breakout season, but nobody predicted that this would happen.
 
Oct 18, 2011
44,090
9,719
What was your prediction prior to the season? I highly doubt you were one of the 2 or 3 people out of thousands to pick them to miss the playoffs and if you were, kudos to you for going out on a limb.

I actually warned in the offseason that there might be some regression. Too much went right last season all at once, some career years, picture perfect health and it's sometimes tough for young teams to deal with their first taste of success following a breakout season, but nobody predicted that this would happen.
I predicted regression and was roundly criticized for it because I was biased or whatever, young teams often regress after an overachieving season in sports, that's what happened here, more than likely they will be a playoff team next year after some roster adjustments
 

GreatSaveLuongo

Registered User
May 4, 2009
1,320
366
Probably everyone figured they would be at least fighting for the playoffs instead of sucking worst than Avs and Nucks.
 

CupofOil

Knob Flavored Coffey
Aug 20, 2009
46,684
40,375
NYC
I predicted regression and was roundly criticized for it because I was biased or whatever, young teams often regress after an overachieving season in sports, that's what happened here, more than likely they will be a playoff team next year after some roster adjustments

Fair enough and I agree. Prime candidate for regression coming into this season and prime candidate for bounce back next season with the one caveat being another damaging Chia deal. Made arguably the 3 worst deals of the last 3 offseasons (although I'm still "ok" with the Hall/Larsson trade) so can he make it 4 in a row? Stay tuned... :(
 

The Panther

Registered User
Mar 25, 2014
19,209
15,783
Tokyo, Japan
McDavid not so generational this season.
This shouldn't surprise me on the main board, but your comment demonstrates you know nothing about hockey. In the first place, the word "generational" is not often used by intelligent hockey fans, but has become the buzz-word of tweens who think it applies to every high draft-pick before they've played an NHL game. In the second place, McDavid has been incredibly impressive this season. He's scoring at exactly the same pace as last season, despite the entirety of the rest of the team regressing, and the Oilers as a team being in 23rd place offensively (last year, 8th). He also has the best plus/minus on his team. In other words, he's better than he was last season. It's the rest of the team (possible exceptions of Nurse and Draisaitl) who've been disastrous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PunkRockLocke

Rolo

Registered User
Aug 9, 2011
2,645
1,324
Maroon-McDavid-Debrincat
Hall-Draisaitl-Puljujarvi
Beauvillier-Barzal-Eberle (NYI's 2nd line lol)
Caggiula-RNH-Kassian
 

ZJuice

pickle juice connoisseur
May 17, 2010
10,515
9,050
Edmonton
Just feed off of it my fellow Oiler fans.

Use the salt of HFBoards as super electrolytes to crank out a few more reps or even in the bath to soothe sore muscles
 
  • Like
Reactions: marty111

The Panther

Registered User
Mar 25, 2014
19,209
15,783
Tokyo, Japan
Starting to think that the Oilers will never be good until they start getting some production out of 2nd+ round picks. That's pretty much the only constant over the last 10'ish years.
This is very true.

I think the hockey Gods decided to punish Edmonton after 1981. In the 1979, 1980, and 1981 drafts, they picked: Kevin Lowe, Mark Messier, Glenn Anderson, Andy Moog, Jari Kurri, Paul Coffey, Grant Fuhr, Steve Smith.

In the 36 years since 1981, they have not drafted players with the collective value of those 8 guys. The period roughly 1982 to 1993 was a complete disaster, reaching its nadir in 1990 when every single player they drafted failed to play a single game in the NHL (!). They picked one good player in 1993 (Arnott) and one in 1994 (R.Smythe) before going back into the crapper. (Example: Between 1995 and 2000, the best player they picked -- out of 57 picks -- was Shawn Horcoff.)

In 2001, they picked Hemsky, a very skilled but under-performing player...followed by a bunch of scrubs, a pattern repeated in 2002 and 2003. In 2004, they went for a 1st-round goaltender, and a pretty good one -- Devan Dubnyk -- whom they subsequently ran out of town after several quite good seasons. With his current team, he was a 2nd-team All Star and has a 122-65 record, ha,ha -- but don't worry: for trading away that one decent pick of the first-half of the 2000s, the Oilers got, in exchange, Matt Hendricks, who scored 38 points in 214 games! Yay! (Winnipeg subsequently nabbed him as a free-agent, meaning that the Oilers effectively traded an All-Star starting goalie for... absolutely nothing.)

The 2005 to 2008 drafts yielded one pretty-good player each season -- Cogliano, Petry, Gagner, and Eberle. None were going to set the world on fire, but each had something to offer. With Eberle, I think maybe they got about as much out of him as they were going to (last year they traded him for a cheaper contract -- Strome's), but Cogliano, Petry, and Gagner were all players I think they failed to develop properly and lost too early. By the way, what did the Oilers get in collective return for those three pretty-good and regular NHL players?: Marc-Olivier Roy (drafted 5 years ago, never played); Jonas Siegenthaler and Caleb Jones (both drafted 3 years ago -- never played); and Teddy Purcell (61 games played), who was then traded away for a draft pick (Matthew Cairns) who has never played. That is, the Oilers have so far gotten 61 games (-9) out of the corpse of Teddy Purcell, in exchange for Cogliano, Petry, and Gagner, all still playing at a high level today.

The big pick of 2009 (Magnus Paajarvi) was a complete bust, and thereafter begins the era of draft-lottery winners and 1st overalls that meshed badly with team culture (Hall), never quite fulfilled potential (Nugent-Hopkins), or were themselves complete busts (Yakupov). The only one of those guys who was a consistent producer has famously been traded for a good, if unspectacular, top-4 defenceman who is currently injured and in the midst of a middling season.

I mean, you can't make this stuff up.

The current Oilers admin. is most certainly NOT responsible for any of these draft-related disasters and disaster-trades going back to 1982 (they are responsible for the Hall trade, but it's too early to close the book on that one), and, in fairness, the recent years have turned up Draisaitl, McDavid, and Puljujarvi, and for once I expect the team is going to keep those guys for the duration and let them develop in Edmonton (well, they certainly can't trade McD or Drai's contracts to most teams).

But, just as the poster I quoted says -- beyond these top-round picks, where are the 2nd, 3rd-round picks who, of necessity, must form the backbone and role-players of any NHL team?

Unbelievable but true: With the exception of Anton Shlepyshev (with a staggering 7 goals in 4.5 years), not one player Edmonton has picked past the 1st-round since 2013 is currently an NHL player. Aside from (again) Shlepyshev, the collective 26 players picked (2nd round or later) from 2013 to 2016 have played... 1 NHL game.

Again, you cannot make this stuff up.


So, either the Oilers have had the worst draft-scouts in League history (quite possible) since the early 1980s, or they have by-far the worst player development of any team (also quite possible).

The frightening fact is that both of those things are quite likely true.

No intelligent hockey fan has ever believed that one or two great players make a team win. They never have, ever, in NHL history. What makes a team win is a core group of players, developed by the team slowly and with patience and authority, over a number of years (along with the requisite talent and leadership, etc.). As long as Edmonton continues to fail to develop deep draft picks and keep drafting horrible picks, they can win all the 1st overall picks we want and they're not going anywhere.

The question is: Does current management understand this?
 

McShogun99

Registered User
Aug 30, 2009
17,885
13,353
Edmonton
We have 3 forwards that belong in the NHL. The rest of the forwards are either to slow or should be in the minors. 3 of the top 4 defenceman from last season are either injured or playing injured and Talbot can’t stop a beach ball this season.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad