Husko
Registered User
Agreed on where the discussion splits.Stating that Brian Campbell, who's managed to finish top ten in scoring for defensemen a few times, wasn't a bona fide #1 defenseman has absolutely no bearing on whether Erik Karlsson, who regularly leads the league in defenseman scoring, is a #1 defenseman is a completely ridiculous argument. Karlsson is as elite of an offensive defenseman as they come. Campbell, while he certainly had elite seasons offensively, is nowhere near the same caliber of offensive talent.
The real argument in favor of Campbell is one that revolves around what exactly makes a "#1" defenseman. If that simply means being one of the 30 best defensemen in the league (which is the definition that makes the most sense since there are 30 teams in the league), then 2007-08 Campbell, even with his defensive deficiencies, most likely qualifies.
That said, it seems that most people think of a "#1 defenseman" as an all situations defenseman who can anchor a Stanley Cup winner. If that's the definition, then it's a far weaker argument in favor of Campbell.
I prefer the second definition. The first definition would mean that if I use the phrase '#1 QB' that there are 32 of them that fit that description in the NFL, and all Bills fans should know that isn't true.