zeke
The Dube Abides
- Mar 14, 2005
- 66,937
- 36,957
Still no good way to measure QoC. Looking at toiqoc with relative stats can lead somewhere, but you can't really use it to directly compare players. There hasn't been enough discussion here about the holes of the metric. On its own, toiqoc is worthless
ZS used to be the rage here, but it turned out that it doesn't indicate usage or performance particularly well.
TOIqoc is a great metric, imo. You're looking at 31 different coaches estimation of who their best players are. Even if some players get over pr underrated by some coaches, oveeall i can't see it being too misleading.
ZS% is very important too - but the thing is, unlile qoc, we already have good adjustments for zone starts. Once you click "adjust" on corsica, for example, you no longer have to worry about looking at zone starts. it's already accounted for.