Gostisbehere Vs Rielly

Gostisbehere Vs Rielly

  • Shayne

    Votes: 250 61.3%
  • Morgan

    Votes: 158 38.7%

  • Total voters
    408
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
Still no good way to measure QoC. Looking at toiqoc with relative stats can lead somewhere, but you can't really use it to directly compare players. There hasn't been enough discussion here about the holes of the metric. On its own, toiqoc is worthless

ZS used to be the rage here, but it turned out that it doesn't indicate usage or performance particularly well.

TOIqoc is a great metric, imo. You're looking at 31 different coaches estimation of who their best players are. Even if some players get over pr underrated by some coaches, oveeall i can't see it being too misleading.

ZS% is very important too - but the thing is, unlile qoc, we already have good adjustments for zone starts. Once you click "adjust" on corsica, for example, you no longer have to worry about looking at zone starts. it's already accounted for.
 

whitstifier

Honor Black Excellence in Hockey
Mar 19, 2013
5,826
1,363
TOIqoc is a great metric, imo. You're looking at 31 different coaches estimation of who their best players are. Even if some players get over pr underrated by some coaches, oveeall i can't see it being too misleading.

ZS% is very important too - but the thing is, unlile qoc, we already have good adjustments for zone starts. Once you click "adjust" on corsica, for example, you no longer have to worry about looking at zone starts. it's already accounted for.

TOIqoc fails with forwards. Somewhat useful with D, but still a bad measure of QoC overall. As a basis of direct comparison, it sucks.

ZS don't reflect usage or performance with much accuracy. It's not a helpful stat.
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
TOIqoc fails with forwards. Somewhat useful with D, but still a bad measure of QoC overall. As a basis of direct comparison, it sucks.

I don't get it. Look at ice time distribution around the league - are you really going to say it's a leaguewide trend that bad players are getting more icetime than good ones?
 
Last edited:

whitstifier

Honor Black Excellence in Hockey
Mar 19, 2013
5,826
1,363
I don't get it. Look at ice time distribution around the league - are you really going to say it's a leaguewide trend that bad players are getting less icetime than good ones?

Depends on team depth and coaching decisions. Better players usually get more minutes.
 

Adtar02

@NateThompson44 is a bum
Apr 8, 2012
4,883
5,750
2nd star 2 the right
Depends on team depth and coaching decisions. Better players usually get more minutes.
as well as team make up. Its very subjective hence best to use to compare across same team do to so many variables. Zone starts is awesome but the adjusts are wildly over blown. they are not accurate enough as of yet. The amount up or down is too high. While the extremes you notice bigger differences closer to the middle doesn't. and they track them differently. you have on the fly d zone O zone and Neutral Zone.. are all being used or not. that why its good to help paint a picture but not define the picture.
 
Last edited:

Isaac Nootin

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
7,590
11,899
Is this a jinx thread for Ghost? In the 6 games since it was created....

6 GP 0 Goals 0 Assists 0 Points -5
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
I for one am shocked that a steady dose of tougher matchups has hurt his superficial stats.
 

StoneHands

Registered User
Feb 26, 2013
6,608
3,674
Is this a jinx thread for Ghost? In the 6 games since it was created....

6 GP 0 Goals 0 Assists 0 Points -5
Maybe if Ghost goes pointless the rest of the season Rielly will have an outside chance at catching him! Ghost is trying his best to be as bad in his own end as Rielly but unfortunately Rielly is also a -5 since the thread opened so he's not making up any ground. He's now a -6 which is quite impressive given the fact that no other regular Leafs defender is worse than a +5. He plays tough minutes so regardless of how he performs, that's all that matters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Rage Kage

whitstifier

Honor Black Excellence in Hockey
Mar 19, 2013
5,826
1,363
I for one am shocked that a steady dose of tougher matchups has hurt his superficial stats.

Tougher matchups? He's been getting the same matchups for the past 30ish games.

ToiQoc still sucks
 

MorgantiDrinksBlood

Registered User
Dec 26, 2011
2,937
3,074
Tokyo, Japan
I don’t think the gap is anywhere near people are making it out to be, but Ghost is better. That’s it. No need to crush the other player. I’d f***ing love to have Reilly in philly, really good dman, Ghost has just been a monster this year.
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
There wasn’t a single non flyers fan on this board that didn’t say Coots was “more than a 3rd line C” “never hit 40 points”. Come on lol

Again, his ES stats and qualcomp always told us he was excellent, even though many other players "pulled a ghost" and put up gaudier numbers in much softer usage and with much more PP time.
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
I don’t think the gap is anywhere near people are making it out to be, but Ghost is better. That’s it. No need to crush the other player. I’d ****ing love to have Reilly in philly, really good dman, Ghost has just been a monster this year.

Again, Rielly puts up better numbers against much much tougher competition.

The gap is quite large - Rielly is much better.
 

Cotton

Registered User
May 13, 2013
9,120
5,611
It’s Rielly, it isn’t close. Ghost puts up more points but would never be slotted above him on any team, or put on the ice to protect a lead, kill penalties, or pretty much do anything beyond what he currently does. And what he does has value, but much like Shattenkirk he’s a specialist who’s best served being sheltered.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeke and Kelly
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad