Kosikarzzz
Registered User
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I will try to explain this with out using the word Salary CAP. What if the NHL was set up in such a way that there were ceilings and basements. Meaning that the highest team is allowed to be $X amount larger than the lowest salary team. For example....The Rangers are only allowed to be $30 million more than the lowest team...Columbus at $25 million. Therefor the Rangers would be allowed to have a salary of $55 million MAX! (I just through those numbers out there and I know that they are not accurate but I think it shows my point.) As the league grows or shrinks financially...so does every team. If the lowest team grows financially, the salary Cap...(opps) rises than so can the highest teams cap. Vise versa!
You can always count on teams rebuilding...and having low salaries. You can always count on teams going for it...or peaking. Using my method I beleive that there could always be a balance. Salaries won't jump too high because teams will be pressured to watch the top line (ceiling) as well as watching the bottom line (basement).
It is just a start of an idea that could work...its kind of like a flexable cap that moves with the financial trends of the all NHL teams.
Who knows...a $30 million could be too high!
What do you think?
Would it work?
What would you change here?
Would a $30 million buffer between highest and lowest be enough or too much to balance out the NHL?
I will try to explain this with out using the word Salary CAP. What if the NHL was set up in such a way that there were ceilings and basements. Meaning that the highest team is allowed to be $X amount larger than the lowest salary team. For example....The Rangers are only allowed to be $30 million more than the lowest team...Columbus at $25 million. Therefor the Rangers would be allowed to have a salary of $55 million MAX! (I just through those numbers out there and I know that they are not accurate but I think it shows my point.) As the league grows or shrinks financially...so does every team. If the lowest team grows financially, the salary Cap...(opps) rises than so can the highest teams cap. Vise versa!
You can always count on teams rebuilding...and having low salaries. You can always count on teams going for it...or peaking. Using my method I beleive that there could always be a balance. Salaries won't jump too high because teams will be pressured to watch the top line (ceiling) as well as watching the bottom line (basement).
It is just a start of an idea that could work...its kind of like a flexable cap that moves with the financial trends of the all NHL teams.
Who knows...a $30 million could be too high!
What do you think?
Would it work?
What would you change here?
Would a $30 million buffer between highest and lowest be enough or too much to balance out the NHL?