The Kingslayer
Registered User
He didn't play that much last night but I thought for a first game back after passing away that Andrighetto was noticeable in a good way.
OK, fair point, but there's a large contingent of the board who considers him our MVP defenseman and an irreplaceable core piece who should be paid whatever he wants for however long he wants. That's a stretch. He's a good #3 defenseman, but no more.
OK, fair point, but there's a large contingent of the board who considers him our MVP defenseman and an irreplaceable core piece who should be paid whatever he wants for however long he wants. That's a stretch. He's a good #3 defenseman, but no more.
OK, fair point, but there's a large contingent of the board who considers him our MVP defenseman and an irreplaceable core piece who should be paid whatever he wants for however long he wants. That's a stretch. He's a good #3 defenseman, but no more.
I would disagree on that evaluation of Weber. He's old and broken down now, but in his prime he was absolutely one of the top 5 D in the league. And saying he is "one dimensional outside of his shot" is a weird thing to say. He's one dimensional outside of this other dimension he has?Then why list Weber? He's just as "one-dimensional" as Barrie outside of his shot, and so his inclusion leads me to believe that you are arguing that a blueliner who sucks at moving the puck or keeping it in, can still be elite, which I vehemently disagree with. Hedman is a stud, but he's stud because of what he can do when his team has the puck, not because he's as good as Larsson against it.
I would disagree on that evaluation of Weber. He's old and broken down now, but in his prime he was absolutely one of the top 5 D in the league. And saying he is "one dimensional outside of his shot" is a weird thing to say. He's one dimensional outside of this other dimension he has?
Hedman also plays great defense so I don't know why you would single him out as being an offensive defenseman. Yes, he plays great with the puck, but what separates him from Barrie is that he can singlehandedly get the puck back in order to work that magic.
OK, fair point, but there's a large contingent of the board who considers him our MVP defenseman and an irreplaceable core piece who should be paid whatever he wants for however long he wants. That's a stretch. He's a good #3 defenseman, but no more.
Certainly, and his point totals reflect that. All I'm saying is that saying that without also acknowledging that there are other very important things about his game that are lacking is disingenuous.I'd say that is a stretch in the other direction. If Barrie is a #3, he is an elite one. One of the single best defensemen at providing offense in the NHL.
Certainly, and his point totals reflect that. All I'm saying is that saying that without also acknowledging that there are other very important things about his game that are lacking is disingenuous.
Certainly, and his point totals reflect that. All I'm saying is that saying that without also acknowledging that there are other very important things about his game that are lacking is disingenuous.
To me right now, the biggest issue on defense isn't even close to Barrie. Barrie is doing what he can and is over extended right now. The biggest issue is Z. This is the time where he needs to step up and start being more consistent. Play up to his talent level and not this inconsistent mess that he is. I fear he will never turn that corner in consistency...
To me right now, the biggest issue on defense isn't even close to Barrie. Barrie is doing what he can and is over extended right now. The biggest issue is Z. This is the time where he needs to step up and start being more consistent. Play up to his talent level and not this inconsistent mess that he is. I fear he will never turn that corner in consistency...
This is why I kinda wish we were in on Ian Cole. Yeah he’s not in the age range of our core, but he’s capable of playing top 4 minutes and we wouldn’t have to deal with Nemeth/Lindholm/Siemens playing as much.
This is why I kinda wish we were in on Ian Cole. Yeah he’s not in the age range of our core, but he’s capable of playing top 4 minutes and we wouldn’t have to deal with Nemeth/Lindholm/Siemens playing as much.
Zadorov is as inconsistent as he ever was. There's no progression on that front. None. Playing like a top pair dman in one game, playing like an AHL guy in the other.Z is still only 22, bit early for those type of statements.
Zadorov is as inconsistent as he ever was. There's no progression on that front. None. Playing like a top pair dman in one game, playing like an AHL guy in the other.
I know right? It is, though.lol this can’t be real
I know right? It is, though.
Which part you don't believe? That he can be super good? Super bad? Or that he's super inconsistent?I refuse to give you so little credit as to think you could actually believe that. That was just a really bad attempt at trolling