Man, Wennberg can't do anything right can he?
It's not like that was a gimme goal, and especially from someone like Wennberg.
As someone who has played goalie and skated out for 20 years I can tell you that was not an easy shot. While it's not the easiest save either, but if your positioning is solid and you get a strong push that should be a routine save and the only way one should get by you is if it's ripped over your shoulder, not down low.
This isn't the goal to hype up Wennberg. It wasn't a bad shot, as he got good "wood" on it. But if you watch the replay, you will see that you gave the exact reasons why it was not anything special, and in the NHL, SHOULD go in most of the time. Panarin is right in the slot, Jenner attacks the "short side" of the net just before (as) Panarin throws it back "far side" to Wennberg. Schneider "cheats" towards Boone for a split sec before pushing over the other way. Now, Wennberg got it off VERY QUICK, but there was a big hole between CS and the post, and most importantly a huge hole above his left pad. It was not top shelf. Boone should get credit for attacking the net at the right time, along with Wennberg for getting it off quick.
Actually to "pile on" Wenny a bit, he nearly gave the puck away on the boards just before that. Its actually what "set up" the goal. Without a little mix up by the 2 NJ players and Panarin jumping in there, that puck gets dumped down the ice....
Wut.
Does he fit with Dubinsky? No
Does he fit with Wennberg? No
The box sheet will tell you all you need to know. That line has over 20 points in the last like 5 games. I'd even wager that line contributed for a majority of our points over the last few games even before this one.
Idk if your being sarcastic or trying to make a point but things don't just happen over night, players don't just groove instantly. Especially not a 19 yo kid who was unsure if he was even guaranteed a roster spot, what position he would be playing or who he would be playing with. And it didn't help neither Dubinsky or Wennberg weren't really doing anything to drive the offense.
My whole point is that "chemistry" and "FIT" are not 'black and white'. Each and every player, no matter what you want to stereotype or categorize them as, is unique. Some are more alike than others, but they all will
mesh together differently. That can be said for every different set of 2 or 3. A pair of guys could play together well with 1 guy and terrible with another, even if the quality of guy wasn't much different.
With all that said, and to pile on Wenny some more, it'd be harder to "not fit" with Panarin than it would be to "fit" with Panarin. I don't care if your Nikolai Zherdev or Jody Shelley. I don't think Dubinsky has had much of a "chance" with Panarin. Quite frankly, and its probably not hard to believe, but I think he'd be very good with him for many of the same reasons Panarin seems to "fit" with Dubois/Anderson. Dubinsky definitely brings some different elements than Dubois, but I don't think he's much different than Anderson.
That's fair. We'll see in time. In your scenario I pick Anderson, but it's not a bad option to have for either one.
Jenner was praised for being a big guy who can score goals. I think that's different than Anderson, who is a guy who scores goals who happens to be a big guy.
I understand the amount of games isn't the same, he seems like a committed pro/there's potential, and usage can possibly be quite a bit different, but my problem with the Anderson hype is that people seem to be hoping or believing that he will be regularly putting up bigger goal scoring/point numbers in the NHL than he did in the OHL or AHL. Sure, if he plays in a "top 6"/scoring role, or "shotgun" with a top offensive guy like Panarin, sure, regular 20-25 goal seasons are a possibility. But the same can be said for a lot of guys. In the league and on this team.