Sorry CR, I completely disagree with you on this one. But I guess we need to remember, you were a big Joey defender. And I could not stand him. And we won that trade hands down. Now I agree that Anderson shows more promise that Joey ever did. But it was still just one year and Anderson was simply unwise to try to turn one year into a long term deal. If he maintains his productivity that he has shown this year. He will be rewarded.
Won the trade "hands down", eh? Nashville went to the finals in good measure because of Johansen. Had he not been injured in the semis, they could very well have won the whole thing.
The notion that Anderson shows more promise than Johansen ever did is something I doubt that any of the 31 NHL GMs would agree with.
Look at Nashville's decision making on their players coming off ELCs. It's a very sound model. What it has allowed them to do is secure young talent on cheap long term contracts which allowed them to aquire and Subban and sign Johansen to a long term deal. They were also able to acquire Turris and Bonino which makes them incredibly solid at center.
There is risk to signing a younger player, but anyone who thought that Johansen or Anderson weren't the real deal at the end of the third year of their ELCs simply doesn't know hockey. . They were both "no brainers" for signing to long term deals. The Columbus front office is apparently more concerned with appearing "strong" in negotiating deals with RFAs than making sound long term business decisions.