This is by far the weakest team on paper the last few years, but we will see if they have more heart and determination for winning than previous years. Still early but not looking good yet
Wild were outplayed most of the night.
Foligno lead the FWDs with even strength ToI. I like him a lot, but he shouldn't be leading in that stat.
Good for you. 2 games isn't enough to make a determination.I don't think we're a playoff team this year even before the season started and these first two haven't helped me think otherwise.
Preseason is over. He always thrives in preseason.Coyle has gotta step up. Hit someone dammit
Not sure where you heard the Wild are the class of the conference... most seem to have us as a middling playoff team, not the class of the conference.Lol the over reaction in this thread. Wild are one of the best teams in the league and still the class of the western conference as predicted by most coming into the season. Two games doesn't change that.
Just a glance at the roster tells me they are a great team and we've seen them play that way before. As "Erin" Rodgers says RELAXNot sure where you heard the Wild are the class of the conference... most seem to have us as a middling playoff team, not the class of the conference.
No need to tell me to relax, I'm not the one overreacting in this thread... I was just commenting on the one claim in your post... nothing more.Just a glance at the roster tells me they are a great team and we've seen them play that way before. As "Erin" Rodgers says RELAX
That wasn't meant to be directed at though although it seemed that way. I'm saying it to everyoneNo need to tell me to relax, I'm not the one overreacting in this thread... I was just commenting on the one claim in your post... nothing more.
Not sure where you heard the Wild are the class of the conference... most seem to have us as a middling playoff team, not the class of the conference.
17 people made predictions in that link... the Wild showed up more often as a WC team than the #1 in the division, and almost as many as the #1's was how many had the Wild out of the playoffs completely... so again... even in your link, the Wild are mostly considered a middling playoff team.Most? https://www.nhl.com/news/2017-18-stanley-cup-expert-picks-predictions/c-291463038
NHL has Minnesota selected 1st in 4 scenarios, winning in a few and going to play in the Stanley Cup.
Sports Illustrated has Minnesota going to the Stanley Cup finals.
Minnesota is the 3rd Western Team in ESPN'S latest odds to win the Stanley Cup behind Edmonton and Chicago.
At this point, this team either needs to be at the top or they need to figure their crap out because it's getting tiresome to see a team back into the playoffs before getting bounced in the 1st or 2nd round. This team is way too deep and skilled to have not gone beyond the 2nd round.
It's not news, but Sebastian Aho will be a star in this league. Kid has the brain power and vision to change games.
I was surprised to see Kuokkanen made the Canes. He looked pretty good too.
Well when you actually play young players with good line mates and give them actual minutes they have success. Instead of you know Marcus Foligno.It's not news, but Sebastian Aho will be a star in this league. Kid has the brain power and vision to change games.
I have been writing down as many predictions as I could by listening to podcasts, reading previews, etc. to see where people predicted the Wild to land in the Division. Results17 people made predictions in that link... the Wild showed up more often as a WC team than the #1 in the division, and almost as many as the #1's was how many had the Wild out of the playoffs completely... so again... even in your link, the Wild are mostly considered a middling playoff team.
What was the avg in that list? I think that number would be far more relevant.I have been writing down as many predictions as I could by listening to podcasts, reading previews, etc. to see where people predicted the Wild to land in the Division. Results
1st
3rd
4th
2nd
5th
6th
7th
The most common was 1st in the division this was about 500 Plus people.
?What was the avg in that list? I think that number would be far more relevant.
You're dealing with a very high number with a very wide spread. You could have 25% only saying #1 and have it as the most... yet you could still have a very large amount saying 3rd or less which together would far exceed the #1 predictions...
Like I said in the post 1st an 3rd were the most common predictions.You're dealing with a very high number with a very wide spread. You could have 25% only saying #1 and have it as the most... yet you could still have a very large amount saying 3rd or less which together would far exceed the #1 predictions...