itwasaforwardpass
I'll be the hyena
- Mar 4, 2017
- 5,330
- 5,142
Ugh...think about what you just said
lol I got a kick out of that also
I know exactly what I said "Ristolainen is not a top 4 dman... he's a 2nd pairing dman,"
Agreed. But Panthers fans arent giving him up. But I understand the ask Becuase that is what it would take.Lundell
Top 4=plays in top 4 role. 2nd pairing is 3/4I know exactly what I said "Ristolainen is not a top 4 dman... he's a 2nd pairing dman,"
To me, "Top 4 dman" indicates he’s also capable-of/serviceable-as playing on the first pairing. Ristolainen is not... he's, at best, a 2nd pairing dman.
Top 4=plays in top 4 role. 2nd pairing is 3/4
So, you’re saying Ristolainen is capable/serviceable as a top pairing dman. Interesting.Inaccurate but okay
Ekblad seems to be out for the season and Florida need a Top4D RD badly for playoffs. Buffalo has mailed it in.
FLA get:
RD Rasmus Ristolainen 5,4M UFA 2022
BUF get:
C Aleksi Heponiemi RFA 2022
- 2nd 2021
-3rd 2022
Buffalo shed salary and get a C-prospect + picks. Florida get a big, nasty D for playoffs. Ristolainen was actually pretty good before covid hit and would probably be a better fit on FLA.
Typically how it goesI know exactly what I said "Ristolainen is not a top 4 dman... he's a 2nd pairing dman,"
To me, "Top 4 dman" indicates he’s also capable-of/serviceable-as playing on the first pairing. Ristolainen is not... he's, at best, a 2nd pairing dman.
Typically how it goes
Top pair dman is self explanatory
Top 4 dman indicates a dman on either of the the top two pairs. There’s two defensemen on each pairs, hence the top 4.
Top 6 dman indicates a guy who can play on the 3rd pair
I know exactly what I said "Ristolainen is not a top 4 dman... he's a 2nd pairing dman,"
To me, "Top 4 dman" indicates he’s also capable-of/serviceable-as playing on the first pairing. Ristolainen is not... he's, at best, a 2nd pairing dman.
Number 3 I say he is. He been playing 25-30 minutes a night since he was like 20. Give him 21 minutes and a fast partner who is good on the rush at defending and he’ll excel.So, you’re saying Ristolainen is capable/serviceable as a top pairing dman. Interesting.
still scratching my head on this bro lol
No matter how you slice it math does not lie.. A 2nd pairing dman is still a top 4 dman.. Plus he is way better than a 3rd pair dman witch is top 6
Haven't they waivers Stralman? I thought he was now like a cap dump.
He plays a ton of minutes and his +/- isn't terrible. An old school GM will give him a contract for sure.Yeah he started the season strong, but his game has fallen off quite a bit. I don't think he'll ever get past that hernia surgery. I think this is his last contract in the nhl.
Counter trade:
Reinhart
Montour
for
1st 2021
Heponiemi/Borgstrom
Juulsen
So, you’re saying Ristolainen is capable/serviceable as a top pairing dman. Interesting.
With the expansion draft, Risto will likely only be on a contender’s team for a season so it’s not worth it given Covid! Maybe without the expansion draft the high price you suggest is feasible butYou missed the first 10 games of the season when him and McCabe were locking everything down in a VERY impressive way. If you get Risto the right partner, he is absolutely a capable and serviceable top pairing defenseman.
COVID absolutely wrecked Risto......and Ralph's "easing" him back into game shape didn't help him much either given that he played 67 min in a 3-in-4 upon returning when he CLEARLY wasn't ready for that many minutes. He's just now starting to round back into shape.....but the team around him is a tire fire right now.
If Buffalo is trading Risto, we're getting more than the OP. Probably a 1st plus something....or the equivalent thereof.