Final Russian roster

Status
Not open for further replies.

wilka91*

Registered User
May 5, 2004
4,251
1
No man, my point is I've seen Malkin and Ovechkin and Lisin play this year in the Superleague for the 1st time (I don't live in Russia) ... and was extremely impressed with their skill compared to all the NHLers in that league.
 

Lord

Registered User
Well, this year Russian squad can be proud of it's attacking group. Talented, balanced, creative, there are also some good defensive-specialists. Many of these guys already proven in games against older players with big NHL experience. And that fact in my opinion gives a big advantage for Russian team.
But in general this team is weaker than 1982 or 1983. Not due only to a mediocre defence we have this year. Coaching is still a question for us though I think in that way this WJC would be better then last one. But I beleive we should rely on Khudobin perfomance very much, last year Barulin failed to do that.
 

Hiishawk

Registered User
Feb 28, 2002
1,225
2
Out there somewhere
Visit site
wilka91 said:
I'm not going anywhere ... I don't even know who was in the 83 or 82 or 84 group except Frolov, Chistov and a couple of others.

All I know is that this year's team has Ovechkin, Malkin and a couple more on it, and no other country can match their firepower.

OK. Fine- you don't remember. But then don't make fun of my memory (regarding the '83s) which turned out to be correct.

Sure, Ovechkin and Malkin may be the two best players in the tournament. But doesn't that contradict what you wrote earlier about the "team being more than the sum of the hyped or famous players" (or similar words)?

By the way, sometimes scouting DOES mean weatching players rather than the ame itself. No harm in admitting that. It's a scout's job.

Finally- my 20 Canadia fws vs. Russia's 6. OK- Take the 13 who actually made it- add Bollland, Brule, Horton, Fehr, Stone, Picard, Bernier etc.---don't you think any of these guys match up well with Yunkov, Voloshenko, Lisin (from Russia's top 6) and AHEAD OF Russia's 3rd or 4th lines? I do. So, apparently, do NHL scouts. So too would the results of the summer U18 tourney in '03 seem to indicate. So too would the WJC ranking and performance by Canada last year (compared to Russia)- and with 9 forwards returning.
 

TORRUS

Registered User
May 31, 2004
1,270
0
Beli
steblick said:
Nhl scouts seem to think so (check not only recent drafts and rankings but also updates etc.Moreover, I do talk with a lot of int'l hockey personnel). The fact is that Canada is really stacked at FW (and DF) this year. Yeah, I'm Canadian but, sorry, that's not bias. That Canada's 85's in particular are outstanding is pretty much an accepted fact. That Russia's '85s and '86s are not so great is also pretty much widely accepted.

Things change though- Russia had better fws (and maybe df) than Canada in the '82 and '83 group. I'm not afraid of admitting that. Right now Canada has a bunch of great fws. That will change too.

Why assume that because I'm confirming what pretty much every knowledgeable hockey analyst says (including folks in international hockey)- that Canada is stacked this year (meaning '85 b-dates)- means that I'm biased (and that that is so so very funny)?

OK, if you are more or less involved in international hockey and if you have been to Russia 4 times and saw those players playing I will accept the fact that you have you're own opinion based on what you saw and I will change the tone of my previous post. Example: I wouldn't have any problems with your statement that Bulgarian team is better and more talented than Czech team if you have been to Bulgaria and saw their players. I would disagree with that but still, I would eccept it as your opinion. And later on, we would discuss Bulgarian and Czech teams.

But here, on these boards, are tons of biased, cocky Canadians that make such posts based on apsolutely nothing with intention to provoke! You and your post seemed to be nothing different.

I disagree that Russia beating Canada would be a major upset. There are no major upsts among big 6.
 

Crossroads*

Guest
velimiiro said:
Hehehehe he isnt russian you bumbling bird brain

Potty mouth. Anyways, how many points does Kost have with Hamilton? I heard he is really stinking it up in the AHL... that's too bad because I thought he'd be real great!
 

Kasparov*

Guest
CloudNine said:
Potty mouth. Anyways, how many points does Kost have with Hamilton? I heard he is really stinking it up in the AHL... that's too bad because I thought he'd be real great!

You fight like a girl
 

MOGiLNY

Registered User
Jul 7, 2003
2,637
1
Toronto
Visit site
Steblick is right. Canada has a hell of a team this year.. Yes, Russia's got Ovechkin, Malkin and a bunch of other puck wizards, but having Ovechkin on the team does not guarantee gold.

This isn't basketball, one or two players can't carry the team on their shoulders unless your name is Hasek and you don't have groin problems.

I'm just a poor college student in Canada, I can't afford to buy satellites to watch the Russian hockey games, but from what I've read, it seems that Russia has been able to put together a group of extremely talented forwards, and it seems that most, if not all of these guys are also responsible defensively and a lot of them also have good speed going for them.

On the dark side though, it also seems that some of these super talented guys have a tough challenge ahead of them as they will have to battle their size issues. While I don't see that as much of a problem against the European teams that will hopefully concentrate on the technical side of hockey rather than physical, the US and Canadian teams will surely be looking to punish everything that moves, and that could prove to be a big advantage for Canada.

And don't forget, Canada too has some excellent excellent forwards, Perry, Crosby, Carter, Richards, Getzlaf, Bergeron, Dawes and Stewart. Heck, I think I just named all of Canada's offensive corps, and all these guys are just as dangerous as the Russians, and most of these guys are also big physical players.

While I live here in Toronto, I was still born and raised in Russia, and will cheer for Russia forever no matter how much bullsh!t they throw at me, so I obviously want Russia to win here, but you just cannot underestimate Canada and it's chances of going gold no matter how many Ovechkins you have.
 

Jason MacIsaac

Registered User
Jan 13, 2004
22,239
5,962
Halifax, NS
2001-2002 team may have been the best:

Volchenkov
Grebeshkov
Knyzev
Tyutin
Grigorenko
Suglobov
Svitov
Chistov
Perezhogin
Frolov
Polushin
Trubachev

When you look at those players from the roster they were downright scary....even without Kovalchuk.
 

theo6060

Registered User
Feb 7, 2003
2,801
0
Visit site
CloudNine said:
Potty mouth. Anyways, how many points does Kost have with Hamilton? I heard he is really stinking it up in the AHL... that's too bad because I thought he'd be real great!
He's 19 playing in the AHL where the league this year is better than usual with the lockout. He has only one person to speak to on the team. He doesn't receive a lot of ice time. He's playing on an inexperienced team that hasn't played well all season. There are a lot of reasons he's not doing well, what can you expect from him this early? Perezhogin didn't take off last year in the same situation until the halfway mark.
 

wilka91*

Registered User
May 5, 2004
4,251
1
JasonMacIsaac said:
2001-2002 team may have been the best:

Volchenkov
Grebeshkov
Knyzev
Tyutin
Grigorenko
Suglobov
Svitov
Chistov
Perezhogin
Frolov
Polushin
Trubachev

When you look at those players from the roster they were downright scary....even without Kovalchuk.

Yeah the problem is that when the Russians play at home, they want to show off, and end up losing everything. Like in 2000.
 

Kaizer

Registered User
Apr 26, 2003
4,574
428
Berlin, Germany
steblick said:
Actually, I've seen 18 of these guys live- from four to ten timeseach. I'm heavily involved ininternational hockey and I've been to Russia 4 times.
I am sorry. It's my bad. I assume usual thing. It's interesting to know opinion from man who has seen both teams' players this year. Thanks for clarifications
 

Jason MacIsaac

Registered User
Jan 13, 2004
22,239
5,962
Halifax, NS
steblick said:
Actually, I've seen 18 of these guys live- from four to ten times each. I'm heavily involved ininternational hockey and I've been to Russia 4 times.
Now, the players on the roster are decent players but ....look at the DF. No one drafted in the 1st round, 1 late in the second. They are OK players- Emelin, Vorobiev, Belov, Megalinsky- but they were only 'good', not great, at the u-18s earlier this year in Slovakia. And in the 4or5 nations tournaments I've seen them in since- there is nobody in goal or on DF who is, or who copuld really be, considered a blue-chipper at all. Forwards too- after the big two, well, Yunkov, Radulov, and Voloshenko have proved their worth somewhat but are still only 18. Parshin is flashy but only 18.

Compared to the '83 squad (yes, I mean that immortal '83 team, not the WJC entry in 2003) this squad is, on paper, oneof the least worrisome Russian teams I've ever seen. You seem to confirm this at the end of your post-and NHL scouts confirm it too.

Still, I'm not saying they can't win. Upsets do happen- but this is hardly in anysense a powerhouse team from Russia. Compared to Canada this year- well, it would be a major upset if Russia beat them.

(P.S. The 82's were great too- Frolov, Zainullin, Yakubov, Vorobiev, Svitov et al.
Any reason why Khomutov was left off the roster? I want to know if it came from NJ's side or Russia's.
 

Jason MacIsaac

Registered User
Jan 13, 2004
22,239
5,962
Halifax, NS
wilka91 said:
With this roster, Russia > Canada

It's so obvious!
Its obvious that you truely don't know squat about the North American prospects. Canada's forwards can match the fire power with Russia and our defense is leagues upon leagues better then the russians. The only thing I feel Russia may have over Canada is more game breakers which can go a long way.
 

wilka91*

Registered User
May 5, 2004
4,251
1
JasonMacIsaac said:
Its obvious that you truely don't know squat about the North American prospects. Canada's forwards can match the fire power with Russia and our defense is leagues upon leagues better then the russians. The only thing I feel Russia may have over Canada is more game breakers which can go a long way.

Another ultrabiased Canadian. Wake up man, with your best of the best players your country has failed to win this tourney since ... errr ... 1997 :lol:
 

Jason MacIsaac

Registered User
Jan 13, 2004
22,239
5,962
Halifax, NS
wilka91 said:
Another ultrabiased Canadian. Wake up man, with your best of the best players your country has failed to win this tourney since ... errr ... 1997 :lol:
You don't know enough about the game to say I am biased. I follow all prospects and will tell you Russia is one dimentional. Czechs may have a better allround game then the Russias and I feel the Czechs are being overlooked in this tourney.
 

aragorn

Do The Right Thing
Aug 8, 2004
28,556
9,061
Kaizer said:
How can you compare If, I assume, you have seen only Ovechkin from this roster. I haven't seen anyone from team Canada and I don't compare but what's your point based on? Stats, HF hype, "Times you've heard about this guy of HF" or something else? Where do find this numbers? 6, 20?
How many players you've seen to make this compare? I don't mean single clips - I mean full games.
And what does it mean "How many sure NHL guys on DF?" Better player were selected, not better prospects. Look at Lyamin other guys are better this year but , in case of his select, with all this hype around him, you or someone else would say that we have one guy at D with good future on NHL. His teammate Belov is better. The same story is about Glazachev. Young Galimov is better that Glazachev. He is one the reasons Glazachev was loaned. Glazachev has hype around him, but Galimov hasn't and does it mean that Galimov bad player?

Well our roster don't impress me much too after Ovehckin and Malkin but I understand that we can not select whole team where every player has the same level as Ovehckin and Malkin. It's normal.

FYI, U-20 team with Kovalchuk had sucked a lot at WJC 2001 and even wasn't in Top-4. U-20 WJC 2003 team was one of the better WJC teams I've ever seen. This team is a bit weaker but a lot better than WJC 2004 team.

Kaiser, what kind of a player is Nikulin? How good is he? Why didn't Igor Mirnov make this team, is he too old?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad

-->