First off, I apologize if there's another thread about this. I am confused as to which deal is better for the players... I am pro-owner, but that really has nothing to do with this question. I just saw Glenn Healy on TV talking about how much better the current deal is for the players than the one that was offered by the NHL in February; I found that odd because Jeremy Roenick said the February proposal "beats the ****" out of the one that the players are going to sign in the next few days. Since Healy is a massive homer and his entire argument has changed since the beginning of the lockout, I thought I would ask here for an answer. Is the speculated deal better for the players than the NHL's 'final' offer from February? Thanks in advance.