I think Tanking is not so much of a strategy as it is a logical consequence.
The goal is the Stanley Cup.
If you are not currently a Cup contender then you ask what could make you that ? If you have a pool of prospects on the horizon that could fill out those key positions the big club is missing, fine, you wait.
If you have the assets to get those pieces in a trade, you make trades.
We are not even a play-off team.
We are short at least one, but maybe two, top 6 centres.
We do not have the assets to get an established top centre, let alone two, to help make us a contender.
We have a number one D man, no number 2. a number 3 , shaky no. 4 and bottom pairing D. We do not have the assets to get an established no.2 D man.
We do not have a high quality prospect pool to deliver the needed pieces within the next year or two. A guy like Juulsen could play, but he needs time to develop at the NHL level for example.
We do have big contract aging players in Price, Weber and Patches incoming.
What is the point of having Patches and Weber, and especially Weber who is going through the last few years of what could be his last top level hockey ? What is the point of locking into a long term high cost contract with Patches without having these important pieces coming in ? well, you dont.
Guys like Weber and Patches may get us prospects , draft picks and maybe an established player to acquire the needed core pieces. There will be futures here, with varying degrees of risk.
You look at the Oil. lots of top draft picks. RNH was a no.1 overall but he turned into a pretty good 2C, but not a 1c. Nurse a solid 2nd pair guy they picked 7th OA I believe. Yakupov a 1st overall busted. They nailed it with McDavid . Draisatl, Hall and Eberle, but then squandered away 2 of those assets. As well, the Oil just sat back for years not actively trying to piece together a team, they just waited on their picks.
The Leafs were gifted Matthews, but they also nailed their Marner ( 4th ), Kadri ( 7th ? ) and Nylander ( 8th ) picks. leafs probably need to move Marner or Nylander to get a top D . If they dont, they are in danger of following somewhat in the Oil foot steps.
So the reality is, when you get those high picks your scouting has to pick the right players. If you do, and then properly develop and keep those players then you have something . Pick wrong or trade guys away, then you have years of pain.
GM has to do his job and get the picks needed, scouting has to do its job and be right with most of those picks, then develop and keep the players, trade for what you are missing. Not easy, we know.
Look at Rangers, they traded away a top 6 2 way centre for the 7th overall pick, Along with their own 21 st they drafted two really good centre prospects but while both could bust, chances are they have at least one guy who can be a top 6C, maybe even a 1C. Maybe they connect with both. If they whiff, they are set back, if they connect, then maybe Cup contenders in a couple of years. You have to be willing to take on risk.
So call it whatever, but I dont see what choice we have other than to trade guys and go for picks and youth that have potential in those missing areas, and even at the no.1 D position given Webers age.
I would love to trade for Hanifin because he is currently 2nd pairing but looks like a good bet to be a top pairing D, I would say a number 1. Canes desperately want to make the post season, could be opportunity here. We would have to pay up, maybe Chucky and Gallagher for Hanifin plus could do it.
We need to move old for young and start again. We will be crappy for a couple years, or much longer if drafting fails us.