John Price
Bet
- Sep 19, 2008
- 373,561
- 24,645
The NFL believes it has investigated Elliott's case thoughtfully, thoroughly and extensively and that Elliott violated the personal conduct policy. The league went through text messages and retained medical and legal experts to help commissioner Roger Goodell make his decision.
Before disciplining Elliott, the NFL considered the domestic violence allegations from February and July 2016, as well as the St. Patrick's Day incident in which he pulled down a woman's shirt, though that did not factor into the league's decision on discipline.
The suspension comes as a result of an investigation that started more than a year ago after an ex-girlfriend accused Elliott of domestic violence in Columbus, Ohio. The Columbus City Attorney's office announced in September that it would not pursue charges against Elliott because of "conflicting and inconsistent information," but the NFL can penalize a player even without legal charges.
Legal authorities concluded that Elliott's accuser was not credible and rejected charging him. Several witnesses, according to sources close to the case, heard the woman yell at Elliott that she would "ruin his career" when she was unhappy that they would not continue their relationship.
nothing was "proven false"The disturbing thing about this is they are jumping to conclusions based on hearsay and conjecture that was PROVEN false.
nothing was "proven false"
prosecutors declining to press charges is all that occurred
Somebody gotta tell me what he did which was 6x worse then what josh brown did
the police do not make the decision as to whether someone is charged with a crime or notMan the police couldnt even find any substantial evidence to charge him, but the NFL somehow did.
Well that escalate quickly
the police do not make the decision as to whether someone is charged with a crime or not
that is prosecutorial