Speculation: Expansion draft

Frk It

Mo Seider Less Problems
Jul 27, 2010
36,242
14,747
For those of us worried about flipping him for Trouba like it was some kind of lateral move, well there is some egg on the face. Our D-core would be better in that kind of swap even while damaging the wing to give up better assets. Oh well, I don't expect DK to be moved, but nobody should be worried if he does, he is a mediocre 2nd pairing D-man in my opinion.

And Fowler. I'm right there with you.
 

TatarTangle

Registered User
Sep 28, 2011
4,453
500
Detroit
If the wings are committing to retooling or rebuilding I don't think it makes sense to consider trading Mrazek. There is no reason we can't wait it out and see. He is still quite young by goalie standards and playing in front of a horrendous D.
I would argue his struggles are mental and lack of discipline in the crease, not so much the horrendous D. The defense is terrible but Howard has played in front of the same defense, and with far less goal support, and has numbers that completely blow Mrazek's out of the atmosphere.

Mrazek's played himself into the third spot on the depth chart, nobobdy is gonna give Detroit anything for him so I agree it doesn't make sense to trade him. Appears he is insecure about someone challenging him for the starting spot, or isn't comfortable with someone else being better than him, so you just hope after Vegas takes Howard away Mrazek rebounds big time and plays well again
 

Rzombo4 prez

Registered User
May 17, 2012
6,031
2,738
I would argue his struggles are mental and lack of discipline in the crease, not so much the horrendous D. The defense is terrible but Howard has played in front of the same defense, and with far less goal support, and has numbers that completely blow Mrazek's out of the atmosphere.

Mrazek's played himself into the third spot on the depth chart, nobobdy is gonna give Detroit anything for him so I agree it doesn't make sense to trade him. Appears he is insecure about someone challenging him for the starting spot, or isn't comfortable with someone else being better than him, so you just hope after Vegas takes Howard away Mrazek rebounds big time and plays well again

Vegas isn't taking Howard
 

Heaton

Moderator
Feb 13, 2004
22,548
925
Auburn Hills
Gotta imagine it's either him or MAF

Maybe, but they could also be a little bit more cost effective, guys like Scott Darling will be available as a UFA is Chicago doesn't re-sign him and LV could grab a cheaper goalie in the expansion draft and sign Scott Darling.

They could also hope that Bishop is available during UFA as well if they like him better than MAF or Howard.

But a few teams need goalies, so they may just go the easy route and take a #1 in the expansion draft.
 

HockeyinHD

Semi-retired former active poster.
Jun 18, 2006
11,972
28
7 forwards: Zetterberg, Nielsen, Nyquist, Abdelkader, Helm, Larkin, Mantha. Glendening and Sheahan are the two forwards who played 40+ the team exposes. Maybe the team flips Z and Glendening if they are being cute. I doubt it.

Edit: Hell, Larkin's exempt. That makes it even easier. Issn't AA exempt too? Tough to tell. If not, protect him instead of larkin.

3 dmen: Green, DK, and either Marchenko or Sproul. Kronwall and E are the exposed players.

Those two are super easy. I have no idea what the team can/will/should do as far as the goalies go after the year Mrazek has put up. I guess protect him since he is both cheaper and up a year sooner, but there aren't a lot of superior choices.
 
Last edited:

Bench

3 is a good start
Aug 14, 2011
21,238
15,015
crease
They still have to at least spend to the cap floor, right? That's going to be harder than you'd think.

Is it? They could sign any number of UFAs to expensive but short contracts. They could also take on cap hits of productive but overpriced players. Or just simply overpriced but shorter deals. It's really easy to take on cash. Ask the Red Wings how easy it is every summer to max out the credit card. Somehow the Wings find a way every year.

Adding salary is probably the easiest thing to do in this league. Now shedding it, there's a magic trick.
 

jkutswings

hot piss hockey
Jul 10, 2014
10,991
8,744
Is it? They could sign any number of UFAs to expensive but short contracts. They could also take on cap hits of productive but overpriced players. Or just simply overpriced but shorter deals. It's really easy to take on cash. Ask the Red Wings how easy it is every summer to max out the credit card. Somehow the Wings find a way every year.

Adding salary is probably the easiest thing to do in this league. Now shedding it, there's a magic trick.
https://www.nhl.com/news/nhl-expansion-draft-rules/c-281010592


"The Las Vegas franchise must select players with an aggregate Expansion Draft value that is between 60-100% of the prior season's upper limit for the salary cap."

So yes, they can further add players as they see fit (with whatever bloated deals they like), but they have to get at least 60% of the cap limit via expansion picks.

So leave Abby and Helm unprotected. Their contracts are plenty bloated.
 

Bench

3 is a good start
Aug 14, 2011
21,238
15,015
crease
Alright, let's see if we can math this out. So 60% via expansion. The current limit is $73 million. This means they only need to add $43.8 million from expansion players.

Since they are drafting 30 players, that's an average of $1.46 million per player. That's a pretty easy target to hit, right? Particularly when you're going to see all kinds of juicy contracts left exposed. Just adding one $6 million dollar player is nearly 14% of the required budget.
 

Bench

3 is a good start
Aug 14, 2011
21,238
15,015
crease
Arizona doesn't seem to have any issues, they could take Franzen's salary or Clarkson's salary or any other dead weight pretty easily.

Let's ignore the UFAs and trades for now. Even if we're just talking about anticipated expansion selections. Let's spitball a possible lineup and see how it shakes out. I pulled this list from some article, it seems reasonable enough. Obviously it's all guesswork, but I think this is a fairly decent cross-section of the types of players that will be exposed. Let's not get hung up on individual choices like Murray or anything.

Forwards

Rick Nash (7.8)—Tyler Bozak (4.2) —Jakob Silfverberg (3.75) = 15.75
Benoit Pouliot (4.0) —Darren Helm (3.85) —Calle Jarnkrok (2.0) = 9.85
Michael Raffl (2.35) —Vladislav Namestnikov (1.94) —Jimmy Hayes (2.3) = 6.60
Brad Richardson (2.08) —Adam Lowry (1.13) —Lee Stempniak (2.5) = 5.71

Starting forwards alone already total nearly $38 million. But let's continue.

Spares: Brett Ritchie (0.88) , Hunter Shinkaruk (1.08) , Brendan Gaunce (1.03) and Charles Hudon (0.73) = 3.72

Forward totals = $41.63 million


Defencemen

Calvin de Haan (1.97) —David Savard (4.25)
Alec Martinez (4.0) —Mark Pysyk (1.13)
Paul Martin (4.85) —Mathew Dumba (2.55)

Starting defenders = $18.75 million.

Spares: Marc Methot (4.9) , Ben Lovejoy (2.67), Nikita Zadorov (1.74) and Ville Pokka (1.78) = $11.09

Defender totals = $29.84 million.


Goaltenders

Matt Murray (3.75)
Philipp Grubauer (0.75)

Goaltenders total = $4.5 million.

Team Total = $75.6 million.

...
...
...

Yeah, it's going to be a real struggle to hit $44 million. Unless I'm completely misunderstanding the rules (always possible, I get older by the year), it seems like they'll struggle NOT to hit the 60% required.
 

HockeyinHD

Semi-retired former active poster.
Jun 18, 2006
11,972
28
it seems like they'll struggle NOT to hit the 60% required.

Didn't know they only had to get to 60% of the floor, which seems crazy low, but alas. That kicks a huge hole in the value of Detroit's high cap low cash contracts... to Vegas, anyway.

The only real strategy here then is to try and game the system to force Vegas to take a bad contract by exposing only bad ones.

Z, Nielsen, Abby, Helm, Mantha, Glen, AA. Expose Nyquist, Sheahan.
Green, DK, one depth guy. Expose, Kronwall and E.
Mrazek. Expose Howard and Coreau.

Vegas has to take one guy from each team IIRC, so unless they'd just take Coreau Detroit's guaranteed to dump one enh contract.
 

Heaton

Moderator
Feb 13, 2004
22,548
925
Auburn Hills
Didn't know they only had to get to 60% of the floor, which seems crazy low, but alas. That kicks a huge hole in the value of Detroit's high cap low cash contracts... to Vegas, anyway.

The only real strategy here then is to try and game the system to force Vegas to take a bad contract by exposing only bad ones.

Z, Nielsen, Abby, Helm, Mantha, Glen, AA. Expose Nyquist, Sheahan.
Green, DK, one depth guy. Expose, Kronwall and E.
Mrazek. Expose Howard and Coreau.

Vegas has to take one guy from each team IIRC, so unless they'd just take Coreau Detroit's guaranteed to dump one enh contract.

Or they'll just take AA when we protect Zetterberg.
 

jkutswings

hot piss hockey
Jul 10, 2014
10,991
8,744
Yeah, I don't get it, either. Abby and Helm are good role players who got oversigned, not key pieces to protect.

Some folks think "try hard" and "hustle" are worth a combined $8M/yr, I guess.
 

Number1RedWingsFan52

Registered User
Mar 17, 2013
40,243
6,037
Winter Haven Florida
7 forwards: Zetterberg, Nielsen, Nyquist, Abdelkader, Helm, Larkin, Mantha. Glendening and Sheahan are the two forwards who played 40+ the team exposes. Maybe the team flips Z and Glendening if they are being cute. I doubt it.

Edit: Hell, Larkin's exempt. That makes it even easier. Issn't AA exempt too? Tough to tell. If not, protect him instead of larkin.

3 dmen: Green, DK, and either Marchenko or Sproul. Kronwall and E are the exposed players.

Those two are super easy. I have no idea what the team can/will/should do as far as the goalies go after the year Mrazek has put up. I guess protect him since he is both cheaper and up a year sooner, but there aren't a lot of superior choices.
Nope both Mantha and AA need to be protected here.
 

Retire91

Stevey Y you our Guy
May 31, 2010
6,172
1,592
Expose Howard, Abby, Nielsen, Helm for sure. Great contracts to get out from under.
 

FireBird71

Registered User
Aug 6, 2015
3,113
1,212
Nielsen is the only one...no way I protect Abdelkader,Helm,Zetterberg or anyone who is signed for multiple years
 

Retire91

Stevey Y you our Guy
May 31, 2010
6,172
1,592
Zetts has to be protected because of the cap recapture clause :( Also think that would be a pretty big smack in the face for someone that meant that much to the franchise. If there is one bad contract that we have to eat I think that is it
 

jkutswings

hot piss hockey
Jul 10, 2014
10,991
8,744
Nielsen is the only one...no way I protect Abdelkader,Helm,Zetterberg or anyone who is signed for multiple years
In concept, I'm with you 100 percent, but I think the recapture penalty on Hank's contract makes him a lock for protection (aside from the whole, 'retire a Red Wing' sentiment).

Can anybody confirm the recapture aspect, relative to expansion selection, or am I wrong on that part?

EDIT: Looks like Pizzarena91 beat me to the punch. :D
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad