Woodhouse
Registered User
From Friday night vs London, Cornel's GWG: http://ohl.uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/chl_ohl/2016/01/26/Cornel.Crashes.m4v
His skill is there. I actually find his game is not dissimilar to Baileys, although his lack of great size (still > NHL average) is the big difference. Their numbers for junior are not too different, they both have great releases, are pretty good skaters, and both have lacked the high tempo game that has limited their output relative to their skill.
Cornel has some decent tangible skills as well.
The next two years are extraordinarily important for his development.
AHL. He's going to need the full 3 years down there IMO. Could see his situation being similar to Shane Prince.My question is -- does he go back for his overage year, or does he sign an ELC and hope to make the Amerks next year?
Tough call.
My question is -- does he go back for his overage year, or does he sign an ELC and hope to make the Amerks next year?
Tough call.
It sure seems like he's thriving as the captain of the Petes. Three consecutive three-point games is impressive.
Yet I read a lot of people here say he blows and isn't progressing. Oh well.
He's a fourth year forward -- he should be dominating on the stat sheet. This is the time when 20-year old players should be tearing the league a new one. He at least has started to answer some of his offensive potential, but now the question is, is it because he's able to exploit his physical maturity and experience or has the light finally clicked and he can take a step forward to be a contract-worthy pro? Next year, he's not going to be able to exploit younger, weaker, less experienced players -- he will be the younger, weaker, less experienced player.
He's a fourth year forward -- he should be dominating on the stat sheet. This is the time when 20-year old players should be tearing the league a new one. He at least has started to answer some of his offensive potential, but now the question is, is it because he's able to exploit his physical maturity and experience or has the light finally clicked and he can take a step forward to be a contract-worthy pro? Next year, he's not going to be able to exploit younger, weaker, less experienced players -- he will be the younger, weaker, less experienced player.
He's a fourth year forward -- he should be dominating on the stat sheet. This is the time when 20-year old players should be tearing the league a new one. He at least has started to answer some of his offensive potential, but now the question is, is it because he's able to exploit his physical maturity and experience or has the light finally clicked and he can take a step forward to be a contract-worthy pro? Next year, he's not going to be able to exploit younger, weaker, less experienced players -- he will be the younger, weaker, less experienced player.
I agree with pretty much all of this, but he's pretty much a no-brainer in terms of getting contract.
He just looks like a good player out there. Not flashy, but solid in all areas of the ice. Would like to see some skating improvement, but still a solid prospect.
For those worried about his "stats", just remember he has generally been the equivelant or better than Bailey every year in the OHL (adjusted one year down for draft year), including this year (vs Bailey last year).
My question will be how he translates the other parts to his game to the next level (as I do not see him as a scorer in the NHL). I believe his likely upper end is a 3/4 center, good size, good defense, but just not physical nor fast enough to be a 1/2. He will need a few years in the AHL refining that part of the game.
He's a fourth year forward -- he should be dominating on the stat sheet. This is the time when 20-year old players should be tearing the league a new one. He at least has started to answer some of his offensive potential, but now the question is, is it because he's able to exploit his physical maturity and experience or has the light finally clicked and he can take a step forward to be a contract-worthy pro? Next year, he's not going to be able to exploit younger, weaker, less experienced players -- he will be the younger, weaker, less experienced player.
He doesn't turn 20 until April. He is progression is pretty similar to Bailey from last year
I don't see the same toolset though to make a comparable with Bailey as a prospect. Does that mean Cornel never makes it? No. Just raw numbers do not illustrate the difference in how they are built.
Can he move well? Don't really get to watch him.He is scoring at a pretty similar clip to Dal Colle this year. The kid can skate well enough, he'll have a chance to make it. A lot of the time, you see these overagers putting up big numbers and people get excited, but they will never be able to skate well enough to find a niche in the NHL. I don't think that is the case here.