garret9
AKA#VitoCorrelationi
I never mentioned Enstrom as being uniquely bad. We had several bad players in that playoff series and you continue to be unable to admit that Enstrom was one of them, even though a poster just provided stats that his corsi that series was below his career average, which should appease your sample size argument. The topic was already on Enstrom, I didn’t single him out.
Given that, why can’t you admit Enstrom had a bad playoffs when he performed well below his career averages?
And I never said that you did...
I joined in a conversation where I had three different posters quoted in my initial post. I added information on what has been a very poor narrative.
I have pretty clearly pointed out that he played poorly... is that not obvious by saying he was slightly above average on a poor performing team? It should be inherent by that...
However, it's small sample and poor team performance however makes it difficult to say specifically how much confounding factors played a role in his poor performance. I'd be more shocked that Enstrom did not play like how he has been the last little while (strong shot/scoringchance/xgoal differentials but weak scoring).
You are arguing against an argument I've never made.