it definitely is a debate where both sides can have a lot of good points to defend their pov
I guess at the end of the day on a purely selfish pov... I think to myself... ive seen kids play a game of pickup hockey. ive seen beer leaguers play a game of hockey. I didn't hang around long to watch. maybe a few mins and I had enough
I went to some junior games and I was able to make it through the game... and of course lots of nhl games. theres definitely a difference for me when the physical play is allowed to ramp up. it really seems to increase the energy and passion out there when everyone begins to crash and bash
now in the nhl its different then any other league, because nhl guys are making on average well over a million dollars to play. theres around 800 contracts in pretty much the entire world where an nhl player can jump from 100k to over a million dollars playing this game
competition for these million dollar jobs is fierce and competitive. if the guys on the other side value their jobs... they know that playing spirited physical competitive hockey is necessary. you are doing the same. if that player shows you up and scores a goal... your job is in jeopardy. if you get the upper hand and you score a goal because he couldn't hang and bang with you... his job is in jeopardy
men being... who men are... when your job and livelihood is in jeopardy... you get emotional and you need to up your game to keep what is yours.
even in a game like basketball... tempers are going to flare and fights will happen. but in basketball they aren't carrying deadly weapons to freak out with. in football theres so much body armor on each other that a fight would probably hurt you more than it hurts him. but they work out their aggression by just laying the torpedo down on one another
I don't watch enough rugby or aussie football to know what the deal is in those sports but I just think we are wishing for unicorns if we think the human male can get this physical with each other with a million dollar a year job on the line... and not reach a point where violence will be necessary
nhl in order to appease its advertisers... certainly is allowed to show a public face that they are against fighting... they can make it against the rules and establish whatever penalties they want. guys that fight and give the league a black eye can see their million dollar jobs come into jeopardy. this is where the race is headed anyhow so I suspect it will continue. fighting will become more and more pushed out of the game. the fights that remain will be more and more the type most of us like. the natural fights that are born from fierce competition.
I cant think of more than a handful of nhl guys who have a job based primarily on their fighting powers today. if we go back 10 years there was probably at least 5% of all nhl players that had jobs for no other reason than their fighting ability.
I think this debate was more relevant 10 years ago. I think the decision makers have weighed in. money talks. I see one of our friends here saying attendance will go down as fighting is taken from the game... but the nhl is NOT an attendance driven league anymore and as they make inroads to going global, the new markets they want to get into are not expecting fights.
the future of the nhl is online like every other sport that will thrive into the next millinia. advertiser revenues and world wide subcriptions to the streaming offers is whats going to keep the league relevant.
the physical nature of hockey is what does make it exciting and gives it the identity that people enjoy. the speed of the game... the impact of the game... without it, hockey can suck.
try to watch 2 bottom feeder Olympic teams play the game against one another... without the physical element on that big ice... its tough. its really tough.
if we cant take the physical and fierce style of play out of the game without making it boring... and if these guys have very competitive multi million dollar paychecks to protect... fights will happen from time to time no matter how much outsiders might frown on them.
I do think its occupational hazard when you give it an honest evaluation. its human nature and I think once you sign that million dollar contract you are giving consent that you are prepared to do what is necessary to earn the money
Dont get me wong Michael. Ive been a fan and played since Original 6 days. I love a spontaneous good fight.
Its just Ive also seen the changes. Masks, helmets, visors, instigator, etc..
I believe in my lifetime if I live long enough I will see full face cages and auto ejection.
Strictly my opinion of what the future holds and some reasons why.
Ive already posted far too much on litigation and evolution of medical diagnosis and studies.
So for me its not an argument Ill engage in specific to like vs like. Brcause I dont think it matters. I think its a question of when more than anything.